Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the concordance between the underlying causes of death (UCOD) on the death certificates written by three emergency physicians (EPs). We investigated errors on the death certificates committed by each EP.
Methods This study included 106 patients issued a death certificate in the emergency department of an academic hospital. Three EPs reviewed the medical records retrospectively and completed 106 death certificates independently. The selection of the UCOD on the death certificates by each EP (EP-UCOD) was based on the general principle or selection rules. The gold standard UCOD (GS-UCOD) was determined for each patient by unanimous consent between three EPs. We also compared between the EP-UCOD and the GS-UCOD. In addition, we compared between UCODs of three EPs. The errors on the death certificates were investigated by each EP.
Results The rates of concordance between EP-UCOD and the GS-UCOD were 86%, 81%, and 67% for EP-A, EP-B, and EP-C, respectively. The concordance rates between EP-A and EP-B were the highest overall percent agreement (0.783), and those between EP-A and EP-C were the lowest overall percent agreement (0.651). Although each EP had differences in the errors they committed, none of them listed the mode of dying as UCOD.
Conclusion This study confirmed that each EP wrote death certificates indicating different causes of death for the same decedents; however, the three EPs made fewer errors on the patients’ death certificates compared with those reported in previous studies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Nationwide estimates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with gender dysphoria in Sweden, 2001–2023: a register-based cohort study Kristen D. Clark, Richard A. White, Sarah S. Jackson, Alkistis Skalkidou, Thomas Frisell, Fotios C. Papadopoulos eClinicalMedicine.2026; 98: 104088. CrossRef
Do Death Certificate Errors Decrease as Clinical Experience in an Emergency Department Increases? Jung Jun Kim, Sun Hyu Kim, Sangyup Chung, Byeong Ju Park, Soobeom Park, Song Yi Park Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Causes of death in children with congenital anomalies up to age 10 in eight European countries Anke Rissmann, Joachim Tan, Svetlana V Glinianaia, Judith Rankin, Anna Pierini, Michele Santoro, Alessio Coi, Ester Garne, Maria Loane, Joanne Given, Abigail Reid, Amaia Aizpurua, Diana Akhmedzhanova, Elisa Ballardini, Ingeborg Barisic, Clara Cavero-Carbo BMJ Paediatrics Open.2023; 7(1): e001617. CrossRef
Factors Associated with Major Errors on Death Certificates Sangyup Chung, Sun-Hyu Kim, Byeong-Ju Park, Soobeom Park Healthcare.2022; 10(4): 726. CrossRef
Errors in pediatric death certificates issued in an emergency department Byeong Ju Park, Sun Hyu Kim Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal.2022; 9(1): 17. CrossRef
Joonghee Kim, Joon-Won Kang, Kyuseok Kim, Sang Il Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Yeo Goon Kim, Won Young Kim, Dong Woo Seo, Jonghwan Shin, Huijai Lee, Kwang-Nam Jin, Soyeon Ahn, Seung Sik Hwang, Kwang Pyo Kim, Ru-Bi Jeong, Sang Ook Ha, Byungho Choi, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Jung-Won Suh, Hack-Lyoung Kim, Ju Kyoung Kim, Sujin Jang, Ji Seon Seo
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2017;4(4):208-213. Published online December 30, 2017
Objective Chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department (ED). Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a frequently used tool for the early triage of patients with low- to intermediate-risk acute chest pain. We present a study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial testing the hypothesis that a low-dose CCTA protocol using prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering and limited-scan range can provide sufficient diagnostic safety for early triage of patients with acute chest pain.
Methods The trial will include 681 younger adult (aged 20 to 55) patients visiting EDs of three academic hospitals for acute chest pain or equivalent symptoms who require further evaluation to rule out acute coronary syndrome. Participants will be randomly allocated to either low-dose or conventional CCTA protocol at a 2:1 ratio. The low-dose group will undergo CCTA with prospective ECG-triggering and restricted scan range from sub-carina to heart base. The conventional protocol group will undergo CCTA with retrospective ECG-gating covering the entire chest. Patient disposition is determined based on computed tomography findings and clinical progression and all patients are followed for a month. The primary objective is to prove that the chance of experiencing any hard event within 30 days after a negative low-dose CCTA is less than 1%. The secondary objectives are comparisons of the amount of radiation exposure, ED length of stay and overall cost.
Results and Conclusion Our low-dose protocol is readily applicable to current multi-detector computed tomography devices. If this study proves its safety and efficacy, dose-reduction without purchasing of expensive newer devices would be possible.
First
Prev
