Objective To test the hypothesis that the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, derived from vital signs taken during triage and recommended by current sepsis guidelines for screening patients with infections for organ dysfunction, is not sensitive enough to predict the risk of mortality in emergency department (ED) sepsis patients.
Methods Patients diagnosed with severe sepsis and septic shock using the old definition between May 2014 and April 2015 were retrospectively reviewed in three urban tertiary hospital EDs. The sensitivities of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, qSOFA, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores ≥2 were compared using McNemar’s test. Diagnostic performances were evaluated using specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
Results Among the 928 patients diagnosed with severe sepsis or septic shock using the old definition, 231 (24.9%) died within 28 days. More than half of the sepsis patients (493/928, 53.1%) and more than one-third of the mortality cases (88/231, 38.1%) had a qSOFA score <2. The sensitivity of a qSOFA score ≥2 was 61.9%, which was significantly lower than the sensitivity of SIRS ≥2 (82.7%, P<0.001) and SOFA ≥2 (99.1%, P<0.001). The specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a qSOFA score ≥2 for 28-day mortality were 58.1%, 32.9%, and 82.2%, respectively.
Conclusion The current clinical criteria of the qSOFA are less sensitive than the SIRS assessment and SOFA to predict 28-day mortality in ED patients with sepsis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Performance of early warning assessment tools in predicting mortality among patients with sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Duo Li, Zhu Yue, Genshen Zhen Critical Public Health.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment of the performance of early warning scores in patients with COVID-19 Victoria Castilho Bartolomeu, Luiz Humberto Vieri Piacezzi, Karina Aparecida Lopes da Costa, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluación del desempeño de puntajes de alerta temprana en pacientes con COVID-19 Victoria Castilho Bartolomeu, Luiz Humberto Vieri Piacezzi, Karina Aparecida Lopes da Costa, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Avaliação do desempenho dos escores de alerta precoce em pacientes com COVID-19 Victoria Castilho Bartolomeu, Luiz Humberto Vieri Piacezzi, Karina Aparecida Lopes da Costa, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Inflammatory Marker for Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and/or Sepsis in Polytraumatized Patients in ICU Ahmed S Salem, Mohamed A Zaghloul, Alfred M Boctor, Mohamed Maher Abd Elfattah, Oliver M Shehata Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2025; 29(12): 1002. CrossRef
Comparison of early warning and sepsis scores for mortality prediction in patients with suspected infection admitted to medical intensive care units Batuhan Başpınar, Efe Cem Erdat, Ebru Ersoy Ortaç, Arzu Topeli Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine.2024; 7(1): 73. CrossRef
Corticosteroid sensitivity detection in sepsis patients using a personalized data mining approach: A clinical investigation Rahma Hellali, Zaineb Chelly Dagdia, Ahmed Ktaish, Karine Zeitouni, Djillali Annane Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.2024; 245: 108017. CrossRef
Navigating the Complexity of Scoring Systems in Sepsis Management: A Comprehensive Review Venkat Reddy, Harshitha Reddy, Rinkle Gemnani, Sunil Kumar, Sourya Acharya Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Performance of point‐of‐care severity scores to predict prognosis in patients admitted through the emergency department with COVID‐19 Priya A. Prasad, Jessica Correia, Margaret C. Fang, Arielle Fisher, Mick Correll, Sandra Oreper, Andrew Auerbach Journal of Hospital Medicine.2023; 18(5): 413. CrossRef
End-to-End Sepsis Solution Incorporating Expert Telemedicine Consultation David F. Gaieski, Brendan Carr, Melanie Toolan, Kim Ciotti, Amy Kidane, Joseph Christina, Rajesh Aggarwal Telemedicine and e-Health.2023; 29(11): 1679. CrossRef
SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xia Qiu, Yu-Peng Lei, Rui-Xi Zhou Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy.2023; 21(8): 891. CrossRef
Using qSOFA and SIRS scores in predicting the outcomes of patients with sepsis in Emergency Department of Menoufia University Hospitals Athar Fekry Lasheen, Tarek Mohey Rageh, Mahmoud Magdy Al-Abassy, Ahmed Ragab Abdo Selima The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2023; 42(3): 801. CrossRef
A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: A meta-analysis Can Wang, Rufu Xu, Yuerong Zeng, Yu Zhao, Xuelian Hu, Ali Rostami PLOS ONE.2022; 17(4): e0266755. CrossRef
A quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment–negative result at triage is associated with low compliance with sepsis bundles: a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective registry Heesu Park, Tae Gun Shin, Won Young Kim, You Hwan Jo, Yoon Jung Hwang, Sung-Hyuk Choi, Tae Ho Lim, Kap Su Han, Jonghwan Shin, Gil Joon Suh, Gu Hyun Kang, Kyung Su Kim Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2022; 9(2): 84. CrossRef
Serum total carbon dioxide as a prognostic factor for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis Jin Hee Kim, Dong-Hyun Jang, You Hwan Jo, Gil Joon Suh, Woon Yong Kwon, Jae Hyuk Lee, Jonghwan Shin, Inwon Park, Che Uk Lee, Sang-Min Lee The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 44: 277. CrossRef
Identifying the Sickest During Triage: Using Point‐of‐Care Severity Scores to Predict Prognosis in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Sepsis Priya A Prasad, Margaret C Fang, Sandra P Martinez, Kathleen D Liu, Kirsten N Kangelaris Journal of Hospital Medicine.2021; 16(8): 453. CrossRef
Thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score improves qSOFA for risk stratification in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study Dongze Li, Yisong Cheng, Jing Yu, Yu Jia, Bofu Liu, Yiqin Xia, Qin Zhang, Yanmei Liu, Yan Ma, Rong Yao, Zhi Zeng, Yu Cao, Shuyun Xu Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).2020; 58(4): 625. CrossRef
Accuracy of the qSOFA Score and RED Sign in Predicting Critical Care Requirements in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study Jong Eun Park, Sung Yeon Hwang, Ik Joon Jo, Min Seob Sim, Won Chul Cha, Hee Yoon, Tae Rim Kim, Gun Tak Lee, Hye Seung Kim, InSuk Sohn, Tae Gun Shin Medicina.2020; 56(1): 42. CrossRef
The sensitivity of qSOFA calculated at triage and during emergency department treatment to rapidly identify sepsis patients Sarah M. Perman, Mark E. Mikkelsen, Munish Goyal, Adit Ginde, Abhishek Bhardwaj, Byron Drumheller, S. Cham Sante, Anish K. Agarwal, David F. Gaieski Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of propofol, midazolam and dexmedetomidine on ICU patients with sepsis and on arterial blood gas Jia Ding, Yuwen Chen, Yuan Gao Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Joonghee Kim, Joon-Won Kang, Kyuseok Kim, Sang Il Choi, Eun Ju Chun, Yeo Goon Kim, Won Young Kim, Dong Woo Seo, Jonghwan Shin, Huijai Lee, Kwang-Nam Jin, Soyeon Ahn, Seung Sik Hwang, Kwang Pyo Kim, Ru-Bi Jeong, Sang Ook Ha, Byungho Choi, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Jung-Won Suh, Hack-Lyoung Kim, Ju Kyoung Kim, Sujin Jang, Ji Seon Seo
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2017;4(4):208-213. Published online December 30, 2017
Objective Chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department (ED). Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a frequently used tool for the early triage of patients with low- to intermediate-risk acute chest pain. We present a study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial testing the hypothesis that a low-dose CCTA protocol using prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering and limited-scan range can provide sufficient diagnostic safety for early triage of patients with acute chest pain.
Methods The trial will include 681 younger adult (aged 20 to 55) patients visiting EDs of three academic hospitals for acute chest pain or equivalent symptoms who require further evaluation to rule out acute coronary syndrome. Participants will be randomly allocated to either low-dose or conventional CCTA protocol at a 2:1 ratio. The low-dose group will undergo CCTA with prospective ECG-triggering and restricted scan range from sub-carina to heart base. The conventional protocol group will undergo CCTA with retrospective ECG-gating covering the entire chest. Patient disposition is determined based on computed tomography findings and clinical progression and all patients are followed for a month. The primary objective is to prove that the chance of experiencing any hard event within 30 days after a negative low-dose CCTA is less than 1%. The secondary objectives are comparisons of the amount of radiation exposure, ED length of stay and overall cost.
Results and Conclusion Our low-dose protocol is readily applicable to current multi-detector computed tomography devices. If this study proves its safety and efficacy, dose-reduction without purchasing of expensive newer devices would be possible.
First
Prev
