Christopher D. Yang, Christine K. Kim, Melissa M. Chang, Pooya Khosravi, Ajeet Pal Bayo Bhatia, Amanda dos Santos, Kyle Dornhofer, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Soheil Saadat, John Christian Fox
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2025;12(3):188-197. Published online September 6, 2024
Objective To evaluate the current body of literature pertaining to the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED).
Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English and primary clinical studies involving ocular POCUS scans in an ED setting. Exclusion criteria were nonprimary studies (e.g., reviews or case reports), studies written in a non-English language, nonhuman studies, studies performed in a nonemergency setting, studies involving non-POCUS ocular ultrasound modalities, or studies published more than 10 years prior. Data extraction was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations.
Results The initial search yielded 391 results with 153 duplicates. Of the remaining 238 studies selected for retrieval and screening, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These 24 included studies encompassed 2,448 patients across prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and case series study designs. The majority of included studies focused on the use of POCUS in the ED to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for papilledema and metabolic aberrations, while a minority of studies used ocular POCUS to assist in the diagnosis of orbital fractures or posterior segment pathology.
Conclusion The vast majority of studies investigating the use of ocular POCUS in recent years emphasize its utility in measuring optic nerve sheath diameter and fluctuations in intracranial pressure, though additional outcomes of interest include pathology of the posterior segment, orbit, and globe.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Now I See It‐Building Expertise in Ocular Point of Care Ultrasound Michelle S. Lee, Aaron Chen, Adrienne L. Davis, Mark O. Tessaro, Mathew Moake, Michael J. Wan, Joshua E. Herman, Shannon Willmott, Martin V. Pusic, Kathy Boutis AEM Education and Training.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Detection of Ocular Emergencies in the Acute Care Setting: a Practical and Evidence-Based Review Simran Qureshi, Timothy Chalom, Mark Sprague, Kalyyanee Nanaaware, Alexander Sonaglia, James H. Paxton Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal pain is one of the most common presenting chief complaints in the emergency department. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an ultrasound-guided nerve block with proven effectiveness in treating visceral and somatic abdominal pain. Despite the increasing popularity of ESPB, its role in the management of nonsurgical abdominal pain has not yet been characterized. Our scoping review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of ESPB in the management of patients experiencing intractable, nonsurgical abdominal pain. We searched PubMed and Scopus to evaluate the existing literature on ESPB for nonsurgical abdominal pain. A total of 14 journal articles were included: 12 case-based studies, one systematic review, and one narrative review. All cases described the successful use of ESPB in treating abdominal pain refractory to oral or intravenous analgesic medications, and no complications were reported in any cases. This scoping review provides support for the use of ESPB to manage intractable, nonsurgical abdominal pain. ESPB has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating various conditions such as functional abdominal pain, renal colic, pancreatitis, herpetic pain, and cancer-related pain. Theoretical risks such as pneumothorax, bleeding, and infection are possible, although the studies reviewed did not report such complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of quadro-iliac plane block and erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia management after single level lumbar discectomy surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective, multicenter study Engin İhsan Turan, Büşra Otlu Bıyıkoğlu, Volkan Özen, Selçuk Alver, Tarık Umutoğlu, Oğuzhan Cücü, Serdar Çevik, Bahadır Çiftçi, Ayça Sultan Şahin Journal of Anesthesia.2026; 40(1): 84. CrossRef
A Pilot Study Evaluating Erector Spinae Block Versus Saline For Emergency Department Patients With Ureterolithiasis Michael Secko, Daniel D. Singer, Gilbert Tetteh, Matthew Vitale, Benjamin Fombonne, Kristopher Bianconi, Rafael Fernandes, Andrea Gowie, Adam J. Singer The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2026; 83: 1. CrossRef
Efficacy of an erector spinae plane block for renal colic: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bart Gerard Jan Candel, Laura N Visser, Ewoud ter Avest, Milan L Ridderikhof, Bas De Groot, Rens Jacobs, Saskia Weltings, Rolf H H Groenwold, Leti van Bodegom, Wilbert B van den Hout, Marleen Kemper, Markus W Hollmann Emergency Medicine Journal.2025; 42(5): 317. CrossRef
Treatment of gastritis and gastroparesis symptoms with erector spinae plane block in the emergency department Richard J. Gawel, Michael Gottlieb, Frances S. Shofer, Michael Shalaby The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 96: 298.e1. CrossRef
The evolving role of truncal fascial plane blocks in non-surgical pain therapy: a narrative review Yi Gu, Yifan Qin, Jin Wu Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Erector Spinae plane block for analgesia in patients with acute pancreatitis: a scoping review Karim Sadik, Khang Duy Ricky Le, William Keenan Next Research.2025; 2(4): 100874. CrossRef
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in the Emergency Department: A Treatment for Intractable Sciatica Carlos A Gonzalez-Cobos, Miguel J Rosa Carrasquillo, Miguel F Agrait Gonzalez Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective In 2011, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine was among the first schools to implement a 4-year ultrasound curriculum. We aimed to find the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) utilization pattern among University of California, Irvine alumni.
Methods We surveyed University of California, Irvine alumni from the class of 2011 and beyond. Survey questions included POCUS reliance, frequency of use, and comfort with image acquisition and interpretation compared with peers. The primary outcomes were self-reported comfort and reliance on POCUS.
Results We received 93 responses from 624 surveyed alumni (response rate, 14.9%), of which 87 were analyzed. Although 46 respondents (52.9%) reported more reliance on POCUS, three (3.4%) relied on it less than their peers. At the same time, 72 (82.7%) and 67 (77.0%) felt more comfortable than their colleagues in obtaining and interpreting POCUS, respectively. No respondents felt less comfortable obtaining or interpreting POCUS than their peers. The frequency of POCUS use correlated directly with the frequency with which POCUS changed the responder’s case management (rho, 0.860; P<0.001). POCUS reliance also correlated with respondents’ comfort level in obtaining (rho, 0.321; P<0.001) and interpreting (rho, 0.378; P<0.001) POCUS results.
Conclusion University of California, Irvine graduates had higher reliance on POCUS than peers in their respective specialties. Their POCUS findings frequently changed their case management.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Real-Time Tracheal Ultrasound vs. Capnography for Intubation Confirmation during CPR Wearing a Powered Air-Purifying Respirator in COVID-19 Era Seungwan Eun, Hee Yoon, Soo Yeon Kang, Ik Joon Jo, Sejin Heo, Hansol Chang, Guntak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Taerim Kim, Se Uk Lee, Sung Yeon Hwang, Sun-Young Baek Diagnostics.2024; 14(2): 225. CrossRef
Role of point-of-care ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: update and future perspective Wookjin Choi, Young Soon Cho, Young Rock Ha, Je Hyeok Oh, Heekyung Lee, Bo Seung Kang, Yong Won Kim, Chan Young Koh, Ji Han Lee, Euigi Jung, Youdong Sohn, Han Bit Kim, Su Jin Kim, Hohyun Kim, Dongbum Suh, Dong Hyun Lee, Ju Young Hong, Won Woong Lee Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2023; 10(4): 363. CrossRef
First
Prev
