Jisook Lee, Do Kyun Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Jae Yoon Na, Bobae Park, Soo In Jeong, June Dong Park, Sung Phil Chung, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S101-S114. Published online May 31, 2026
Pediatric cardiac arrest primarily arises from asphyxia in infants and trauma in older children, contrasting with adult etiologies dominated by cardiac events. This underscores prevention as the cornerstone of pediatric basic life support, through injury mitigation like child restraint systems and water supervision, safe sleep practices including supine positioning on firm surfaces with caregiver smoking cessation to reduce sudden infant death syndrome, plus awareness of child abuse and adolescent suicide prevention. In hospitals, pediatric early warning systems (PEWS) enable early deterioration detection via vital sign scoring for timely intervention. Major updates in the 2025 pediatric basic life support guidelines reflect evidence-driven refinements. First, hospitals should implement PEWS to prompt rapid response teams for at-risk inpatients. Second, all rescuers (lay and healthcare providers) should employ the two-thumb encircling hands technique for infant chest compressions for optimal depth (about 4 cm), rate (100–120/min), and recoil; one-hand heel compression serves as backup if infeasible. Third, lay rescuers may apply automated external defibrillators for nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children aged 1 year or older, prioritizing prompt attachment after initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) cycles to address potential shockable rhythms. Fourth, for infant foreign body airway obstruction, alternate five back blows (over the spine between scapulae) with five chest thrusts (using heel-of-hand on sternum) until cleared or unresponsive, then transition to CPR. These updates aim to enhance bystander intervention, CPR quality, and survival with favorable neurologic outcomes in pediatric cardiac arrest.
Do Kyun Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Jae Yoon Na, Bobae Park, Jisook Lee, Soo In Jeong, June Dong Park, Sung Phil Chung, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S115-S141. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 Korean pediatric advanced life support guideline update introduces clinically important revisions emphasizing airway strategy, physiologic resuscitation targets, post–cardiac arrest hemodynamics, neuroprotection, and extracorporeal support. In out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest, bag-mask ventilation is now suggested over endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway placement. In in-hospital arrest, evidence is insufficient to favor bag-mask ventilation versus advanced airways; however, endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway insertion is reasonable when performed with minimal interruption or when bag-mask ventilation is ineffective. For patients with an advanced airway in place, age-adjusted ventilation rates are proposed to avoid hypoventilation and hyperventilation: 30/min (<1 yr), 20–30/min (1–8 yr), and 10–20/min (8–18 yr in healthcare settings). When invasive arterial monitoring is available during in-hospital cardiac arrest, target diastolic blood pressure is ≥25 mmHg in infants and ≥30 mmHg in children ≥1 year. After return of spontaneous circulation, systolic blood pressure during the first 6 hours should be maintained above the age-specific 10th percentile. Neuroprognostication should be multimodal, incorporating serial examinations, electroencephalography (up to 72 hours), early computed tomography (<24 hours), magnetic resonance imaging (72 hours to 2 weeks), lactate trends, and pupillary reflexes. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is limited to appropriately resourced hospitals and may be considered for selected in-hospital arrests (e.g., cardiac disease) unresponsive to conventional CPR; evidence remains insufficient for out-of-hospital use. These revisions shift pediatric resuscitation toward physiology-guided, resource-stratified, and neuroprotective care.
Yunhee Oh, Youdong Sohn, Mi Jin Lee, Sang-Hoon Na, Jundong Moon, Heeje Yun, Hoon Jung, Chang Hee Lee, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Chun Song Youn, Jisook Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S169-S184. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 Korean education and system implementation guidelines were updated using a structured evidence evaluation process and recent systematic reviews. The guidelines present a comprehensive update that aims to bridge the gap between educational theory and clinical performance and emphasize the transition toward high-fidelity, field-based training environments through the implementation of in situ simulation and rapid cycle deliberate practice to foster automaticity in high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and team coordination. The integration of real-time feedback devices during training and the adoption of structured “hot” and “cold” debriefing to maximize learning outcomes are critical shifts in this update. Furthermore, these guidelines enhance teamwork competency by recommending the integration of a dedicated CPR coach within the hospital code team. Despite acknowledging the potential of digital health, a cautious approach toward gamified and blended learning is maintained. The guidelines prioritize face-to-face instruction to ensure psychomotor proficiency. From a policy perspective, the 2025 update removes the prehospital termination of resuscitation criteria in alignment with domestic legal constraints and social consensus. In addition to context-based training strategies within hospitals, we discussed the mandatory age for CPR training. We also added recommendations to address the “decoupling” between high automated external defibrillator awareness and low bystander utilization rates in the prehospital setting. In conclusion, the 2025 Korean guidelines emphasize repetitive, evidence-based educational methods and systematic policy refinements to enhance resuscitation quality and survival outcomes across clinical and community settings.
Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Youngsuk Cho, Sun Gyoung Na, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Sung Phil Chung, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S18-S31. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 Korean basic life support guidelines are evidence-based treatment recommendations for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The 2025 guidelines recommend that after checking the response of a patient suspected of cardiac arrest, call 119 (emergency medical services) immediately and request an automated external defibrillator (AED) before performing procedures to confirm cardiac arrest, such as checking breathing. There is currently insufficient evidence into the clinical effectiveness of dispatcher actively instructing individuals who report an emergency to retrieve and use an AED, but one observational study reported an increase in some survival rates. The guidelines recommend that lay rescuers and emergency medical personnel who have been trained in and are willing to perform artificial ventilation should apply standard CPR including artificial ventilation, and that lay rescuers who are not trained in or do not want to perform artificial ventilation should perform compression-only CPR. The guidelines emphasize high-quality CPR, including effective chest compressions and ventilation. The application of a rapid AED is continuously emphasized, and the anterolateral positioning method is recommended as a priority for ease of application. Healthcare workers are recommended to perform standard CPR with a compression to ventilation ratio of 30:2 for patients suspected of having a high-risk pathogen infection and to wear appropriate personal protective equipment, including a mask or respirator appropriate for the suspected pathogen, gloves, a gown, and eye protection.
Ju Sun Heo, Young Hwa Jung, Ai-Rhan Ellen Kim, Gyuhong Shim, Su Jin Cho, Jung Hyun Lee, Hyun-Joo Seol, Gi-Su Lee, Ah-Young Oh, Hye Jin Myung, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S142-S168. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation provide updated, evidence-based recommendations to optimize the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life. While approximately 85% of term newborns initiate spontaneous breathing independently, timely intervention is critical for those requiring assistance. Key updates in the 2025 guidelines emphasize umbilical cord management, recommending deferred cord clamping for at least 60 seconds in vigorous term and preterm infants (<37 weeks). When deferred cord clamping cannot be performed, intact umbilical cord milking may be reasonable for nonvigorous term and late preterm infants (≥35 weeks’ gestation) and for preterm infants born between 28⁰⁄₇ and 36⁶⁄₇ weeks’ gestation who do not require immediate resuscitation. Respiratory support should be initiated within the "golden minute," starting with 21% oxygen for term and late preterm infants (≥35 weeks) and ≥30% for those <32 weeks’ gestation. The guidelines introduce video laryngoscopy as a preferred tool for less experienced providers and recognize supraglottic airways as a viable alternative to face masks or when intubation fails. For advanced resuscitation, a compression to ventilation ratio of 3:1 is maintained, with intravascular epinephrine (0.01–0.03 mg/kg) as the primary pharmacologic intervention. Notably, the use of sodium bicarbonate is no longer recommended. Discussions regarding the discontinuation of resuscitation are now suggested at approximately 20 minutes after birth if no response is observed. These guidelines aim to standardize clinical practice in Korea to improve neonatal survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Hyo Jin Bang, Chun Song Youn, Min Chul Kim, Yongwhan Lim, Young-Jae Cho, Bitna Chu, June-Sung Kim, Youn-Jung Kim, Byoung-Gil Yoon, Jin Park, Min-Ju Kang, Kyung Woon Jeung, Soo Hyun Kim, Je Hyeok Oh, Taegyun Kim, Sang Hoon Oh, Yong Soo Kim, Changshin Kang, Dong Hun Lee, Jin Hong Min, Hyo Joon Kim, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang, Sung Phil Chung
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S75-S100. Published online May 31, 2026
This guideline summarizes evidence-based post–cardiac arrest care following the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in adults, incorporating updates from the 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and contemporary international evidence. Recommendations were informed by recent randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, with an emphasis on patient-centered outcomes and practical clinical applications. After ROSC, early evaluation should focus on identifying reversible causes. A 12-lead electrocardiogram should be obtained promptly, with echocardiography and whole-body computed tomography performed when clinically indicated to assess cardiac function and detect noncardiac or occult etiologies. Respiratory management aims to minimize secondary brain injury by preventing hypoxemia and hyperoxemia. High inspired oxygen concentrations may be used initially, followed by titration to an appropriate oxygen saturation level once reliable measurements are available, and ventilation should target normocapnia. Hemodynamic management prioritizes adequate organ perfusion and prompt treatment of shock, including active correction of hypotension. Routine immediate coronary angiography is not recommended in patients without ST-segment elevation. However, urgent angiography is indicated in those with ST-segment elevation, cardiogenic shock, or a high likelihood of ongoing myocardial ischemia. In comatose survivors, temperature control is essential. The selected target temperature should be maintained for at least 24 hours, with active fever prevention for 36 to 72 hours. Additional intensive care unit management includes glucose control and seizure monitoring. Routine prophylactic antibiotics or anticonvulsants are not recommended. Neuroprognostication should use a multimodal approach after confounders, such as sedation and temperature management, are addressed, integrating clinical examination, electrophysiology, biomarkers, and neuroimaging to support individualized decision-making.
Tae-Youn Kim, Gyo Jin Ahn, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Dong-Hyeok Kim, Youdong Sohn, Young Song, Gyuhong Shim, Do Kyun Kim, Yunhee Oh, Jin Wi, Chun Song Youn, Myung-Lyeol Lee, Mi Jin Lee, Byung Kook Lee, Byung Heon Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Hannah Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Young Hwa Jung, Woo Jin Jung, Sung Phil Chung, Gyu Chong Cho, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S61-S74. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 update of the Korean guidelines for cardiac arrest under special circumstances incorporates new evidence and expert consensus to clarify when clinicians should modify standard resuscitation algorithms. For cardiac arrest caused by acute hyperkalemia, the guidelines suggest administering intravenous insulin with glucose; however, current evidence remains insufficient to recommend for or against routine use of sodium bicarbonate or calcium. In suspected pulmonary embolism–related cardiac arrest, thrombolytic therapy may be considered. In confirmed cases, thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy may be appropriate, despite very low certainty of evidence. For opioid-related cardiac arrest, current evidence does not support the routine administration of naloxone in addition to standard advanced life support; however, naloxone may be administered when it is unclear whether the patient is in true cardiac arrest. The guidelines also emphasize managing cardiac arrest in the prone position. If the patient is intubated and immediate repositioning is unsafe or impractical, prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation may be attempted using invasive arterial pressure or end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring to guide the timing of repositioning. Immediate supination is strongly recommended for non-intubated patients. Additional updates address drowning, severe hypothermia, pregnancy, anaphylaxis, and cardiac arrest during interventional procedures, underscoring the importance of early correction of reversible causes, appropriate airway strategies, and timely consideration of extracorporeal life support in selected cases. Overall, the 2025 recommendations highlight cautious, etiology-directed interventions and explicitly grade recommendation strength and certainty to support context-sensitive clinical decision-making in high-risk and resource-variable settings.
Tae-Youn Kim, Gyo Jin Ahn, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Dong-Hyeok Kim, Youdong Sohn, Young Song, Gyuhong Shim, Do Kyun Kim, Yunhee Oh, Jin Wi, Chun Song Youn, Myung-Lyeol Lee, Mi Jin Lee, Byung Kook Lee, Byung Heon Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Hannah Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Young Hwa Jung, Woo Jin Jung, Sung Phil Chung, Gyu Chong Cho, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S32-S60. Published online May 31, 2026
The 2025 Korean advanced life support guidelines were updated using a structured evidence evaluation process informed by recent randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. The guideline development group prioritized patient-important outcomes and assessed the certainty of the evidence to formulate graded recommendations. For drug administration during adult cardiac arrest, intravenous access is the preferred initial route, with intraosseous access recommended when intravenous access cannot be rapidly established. Epinephrine remains the recommended vasopressor. Routine administration of vasopressin, either alone or in combination with corticosteroids, is not recommended for in-hospital or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the absence of specific indications, the routine use of buffering agents and calcium is discouraged owing to insufficient evidence of their benefits and potential harm. Defibrillation recommendations were refined based on emerging evidence. In adults with refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia after multiple unsuccessful defibrillation attempts, vector change or double sequential defibrillation may be considered in selected settings when performed by experienced teams with appropriate equipment. Airway management guidelines recommend cricothyroidotomy as a rescue technique when conventional airway management strategies fail. For patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation while on mechanical ventilation, specific ventilator settings during chest compressions are recommended to optimize ventilation and minimize interference with high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The guidelines also address cardiopulmonary resuscitation–induced consciousness, allowing the cautious use of sedatives and/or analgesic agents when awareness interferes with resuscitation quality or safety. Overall, the guidelines emphasize evidence-based practice and individualized clinical decision-making.
Seon Hee Woo, Chang Hee Lee, Mi Yeon Kim, Yongin Kim, Chang Je Park, Myung-Lyeol Lee, Taehun Lee, Kyeongmin Jang, Jun-Ho Jung, Hyun-Kyung Ji, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S185-S194. Published online May 29, 2026
The 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation include a first aid section developed through a systematic review and evidence appraisal. The revision aimed to strengthen prehospital first aid response capacity while reflecting the Korean healthcare system, field feasibility, and relevant legal and institutional contexts. The guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for seven priority emergencies: adult chest pain suggestive of myocardial infarction, suspected acute ischemic stroke, asthma-related dyspnea, anaphylaxis, seizures, shock, and syncope. Core principles emphasize early recognition, prompt activation of emergency medical services, minimizing delays to definitive care, and safe condition-specific interventions. Key recommendations include assisting with patient-prescribed medications when appropriate (e.g., nitroglycerin, inhaled bronchodilators, and epinephrine autoinjectors), using structured stroke screening tools, preventing aspiration through proper positioning and withholding oral intake in patients at risk of dysphagia, administering oxygen only for hypoxemia, and initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients who are unconscious and not breathing normally. Seizure management focuses on safety and emergency medical services activation criteria, while care for shock and syncope emphasizes patient positioning and post-event assessment. These recommendations provide practical, evidence-based guidance for improving patient safety and outcomes in prehospital settings.
Sung Oh Hwang, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Woo Jin Jung, Young-Il Roh, Gyo Jin Ahn, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Phil Chung
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S10-S17. Published online May 29, 2026
In Korea, more than 30,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur each year, and the survival rate remains below 10%. Because OHCA is difficult to predict and typically occurs outside medical facilities, effective management requires not only healthcare professionals but also laypersons, including bystanders and first responders. Survival depends on an uninterrupted and efficient sequence of time-critical actions: early recognition of cardiac arrest and activation of emergency services; prompt bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) for shockable rhythms; on-scene and in-hospital advanced life support with comprehensive post–cardiac arrest care; and systematic assessment of neurologic and functional outcomes followed by rehabilitation and recovery. The chain of survival describes these essential steps required to maximize survival after cardiac arrest and comprises five links: (1) early recognition and call for help; (2) immediate bystander CPR; (3) early defibrillation with an AED; (4) advanced life support and post–cardiac arrest care; and (5) rehabilitation and recovery for survivors. The cardiac arrest survival environment represents a societal infrastructure that sustains and optimizes both medical and nonmedical factors across prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation to reduce mortality. Establishing such an environment requires each community to develop integrated medical systems for prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and recovery, alongside nonmedical strategies, including public awareness initiatives, widespread CPR education and bystander participation, AED dissemination, and coordinated community responsiveness of the emergency medical system.
Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Youdong Sohn, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Yunhee Oh, Chun Song Youn, Mi Jin Lee, Jisook Lee, Chang Hee Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2026;13(Suppl 1):S1-S9. Published online May 21, 2026
In response to the expanding body of research on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and updates from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, the 2020 Korean CPR guidelines have been revised. This article presents the development process and summarizes the major updates in the 2025 Korean CPR guidelines. Seven task forces were established, with members nominated by professional societies involved in CPR. Each task force formulated key clinical questions and conducted systematic evidence reviews using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. The 2025 CPR guidelines were finalized on the basis of the reviewed evidence and consensus discussions. The major updates are as follows: (1) addition of rehabilitation and recovery to the chain of survival; (2) inclusion of guidance for dispatchers on the use of automated external defibrillators; (3) recommendation that trained rescuers provide rescue breaths in cases of drowning-related cardiac arrest; (4) suggestion of double sequential defibrillation or vector-change defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation; (5) revision of the target temperature range for post-resuscitation temperature management from 32–36 to 33–37.5 °C; (6) recommendation of public access defibrillation for children aged ≥1 year; (7) suggestion to use supraglottic airway devices and video laryngoscopy in neonatal resuscitation; (8) recommendation for the use of feedback devices in CPR training; and (9) addition of a first aid section addressing cardiac arrest–related emergencies. These guidelines reflect the most current evidence, and their implementation and dissemination are expected to improve survival after cardiac arrest.
Wookjin Choi, Young Soon Cho, Young Rock Ha, Je Hyeok Oh, Heekyung Lee, Bo Seung Kang, Yong Won Kim, Chan Young Koh, Ji Han Lee, Euigi Jung, Youdong Sohn, Han Bit Kim, Su Jin Kim, Hohyun Kim, Dongbum Suh, Dong Hyun Lee, Ju Young Hong, Won Woong Lee, on behalf of the Society Emergency and Critical Care Imaging (SECCI)
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2023;10(4):363-381. Published online December 29, 2023
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly developing technology that has the potential to revolutionize emergency and critical care medicine. The use of POCUS can improve patient care by providing real-time clinical information. However, appropriate usage and proper training are crucial to ensure patient safety and reliability. This article discusses the various applications of POCUS in emergency and critical care medicine, the importance of training and education, and the future of POCUS in medicine.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in clinical hepatology Madhumita Premkumar, Constantine J. Karvellas, Anand V. Kulkarni, Harish Bhujade, K. Rajender Reddy Hepatology.2026; 83(4): 931. CrossRef
How accurate is point-of-care ultrasound for detecting paediatric appendicitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis Bethaney Miller, David McCreary, Jon Rees Archives of Disease in Childhood.2026; 111(5): 401. CrossRef
Ultrasound to guide critical decisions: What you need to know Mckenzie Rowe, Paula Ferrada Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.2026; 100(5): 692. CrossRef
Bedside Clinical Ultrasound Performed by Family Physicians in Adult Patients With Abdominal Pain in a Hospital Emergency Department: Protocol for a Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study Laura Carbajo Martín, Ignacio Párraga-Martínez, Luis M Beltrán-Romero, Máximo Bernabeu Wittel JMIR Research Protocols.2026; 15: e82393. CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Detecting Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Lavanya Ranganath, Deepti Gowda, Manjunath G.N. Cureus.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Pleural Effusion on Ultrasound Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Teck Yon Lee, Sophia Wong Ching Hwai Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.2026; 54(5): 1208. CrossRef
ULTRASSOM POINT OF CARE EM EMERGÊNCIAS E IMPACTOS NA TOMADA DE DECISÃO CLÍNICA Camila Maria Rosolen Lunes, Lucineia da Silva Toledo, Lucas dos Anjos Seabra, Wellma Jéssyka Silva Costa, Mauro de Deus Passos, Gessiane Brenda Melo dos Santos, Matheus Almeida Maia de Souza, Danylo Ribeiro dos Santos Ferreira , Edgar de Oliveira Cognitus Interdisciplinary Journal.2026; 3(1): 47. CrossRef
Blended learning course for ultrasound-guided diagnostic skills: a design-based research study Rashmi Ramachandran, Nishkarsh Gupta, Kritika Sharma, Mohit Kumar Joshi, Suhani, Karan Madan, Saurabh Mittal, Satyavir Yadav, Aseem B, Niraj Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, Niraj Nirmal Pandey, Anju Gupta, Ambuj Roy Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cardiac tamponade in the emergency department: diagnostic and therapeutic utility of point-of-care ultrasound Maame Akuamoah Yeboah, Nana Serwaa Agyeman Quao, Ernest Ainooson JEM International.2026; 1: 100003. CrossRef
Saudi national survey of point -of -care ultrasound training in anesthesiology residency programs Rothana Majid Aljehani, Abdulrahman Alboog, Haneen Alnazzawi, Albaraa Alnazzawi, Razan Altumaihi, Omar Addas BMC Anesthesiology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Reframing barriers to evidence-based practice in early pregnancy bleeding: Insights from nursing theory and implementation science Iman Nurjaman, Intihan Nurzaeni, Ina Saparlina International Emergency Nursing.2026; 85: 101779. CrossRef
Pediatric faculty attitudes on point-of-care ultrasound education in residency: a multicenter study April Slamowitz, Piyawat Arichai, James Bost, Jeremy Kern, Sonali Basu, Alyssa Abo BMC Medical Education.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Approach of family physicians to the use of ultrasonography in Türki̇ye Enescan Özmen, Hilal Aksoy, İzzet Fi̇danci, Duygu Ayhan Başer BMC Primary Care.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond the Pan-Scan: Optimizing Imaging and Management in Pediatric Blunt Trauma — a Narrative Review Amira A. Aboali, Mandy Elewa, Oluwatosin Mosope Akinbi, Joseph Alhaddad, Abdalla M. Hadhoud, Reshma Pyala, Patrick Yoo, Bethany Bucciarelli, Mohammed Alsabri Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Emerging technologies and AI-assisted tools in cardiopulmonary monitoring Nicolas Orozco, Ross Prager, Robert Arntfield Current Opinion in Critical Care.2026; 32(3): 296. CrossRef
Airway ultrasound in anaesthesia training: a scoping review Sanny Wu, Kenza Elayar, Adrian Wong British Journal of Anaesthesia.2026; 137(1): 244. CrossRef
Validación de la Ecografía Transcraneal Realizada por Intensivistas como Método Alternativo para Estimar el Desvío de la Línea Media en Trauma Craneoencefálico, Correlación con Tomografía Computarizada. Estudio Observacional Enrique Santiago Lanas, Luis Gustavo Paredes, Andres Alejandro Trujillo, Alex Wladimir Guayta, Gabriela Silvana Escobar, Andres Sebastian Herdoiza Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery.2026; 15(1): 36. CrossRef
Impact of Nurse-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) in Adult Intensive Care: A Systematic Review Marco Abagnale, Chiara Palazzo, Nicolò Zampetti, Melania De Filippo, Rita Citarella, Fabio Gennaro Abagnale, Luciano Cecere, Francesco Limonti, Francesco Gravante Healthcare.2026; 14(10): 1286. CrossRef
A Narrative Review of Syncope Decision Rules: A Case for Point-of-Care Cardiac Ultrasound for Cardiac Syncope Elaine Situ-LaCasse, Neil Wallace, David Wasiak, Pratham Patel, Srikar Adhikari Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(10): 3780. CrossRef
Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound on the Management of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Quasi-Experimental Study Laura Carbajo Martín, Ignacio Párraga-Martínez, Luis Matías Beltrán-Romero, Máximo Bernabeu Wittel Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(12): 4810. CrossRef
Evaluating the impact of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) workshop on medical trainees at a Radiology Resident Forum conference: A pre- and post-intervention study Reem El-Hayani, Misha Winnona Mostofa, Yujia Gao, Muhammad Salman Rafique, Sajjan Mann, Muhammad Aqib Maqsood, Lien Meara Salcedo, Kasim Alimohamed, Raima Kaleemi, Sadiyah Raquib, Yusuf Chowdhury, Imran Syed Ultrasound.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
CHOOSİNG ULTRASOUND AS A THESİS TOPİC İN EMERGENCY MEDİCİNE: A BİBLİOGRAPHİC ANALYSİS ON CONTENT AND PUBLİCATİON STATUS Muhammedcan Şen, Ömer Yusuf Erdurmuş, Ahmet Burak Oğuz Akdeniz Medical Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Point-of-Care Ultrasound—A Paradigm Shift in Clinical Practice and Medical Education: A Narrative Review Sulafa Ali, Mohammed A. Alhassan, Hayat A. Ahmed, Ammar Elgadi Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences.2026; 21(2): 169. CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care and Handheld Ultrasound for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yazan J. Alalwani, Lamees A. Alzahrani, Maysam H. Alyami, Abdulrahman A. Alanazi, Mawaddah A. Alsobay, Ibtihaj A. Alsalhi, Alhawraa H. Alawamia, Jumanah S. Al-Siari, Reema A. Alharbi, Dalya M. Motabagani, Ahmed Y. Azzam Evidance Health Sciences.2026; 1(1): 55. CrossRef
Time-to-start of anticoagulant therapy and mortality in pulmonary embolism Kelsey E. Bria, Brian F. Gage, Alejandra Gutierrez, Caleb J. Chiang, Jia Qi Xiong, Serena Flórez-Marqués, Cameron Upchurch, Melissa Beasley, Kristen M. Sanfilippo Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Right atrial and ventricular clot as a cause of peri‐arrest during caesarean birth requiring immediate thrombectomy A. Golan, K. Azem, A. Gogol, L. Weiss, D. Gorfil, S. Fein, S. Orbach‐Zinger Anaesthesia Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Renal screening sonography—A comparative study in a Portuguese basic emergency service Sérgio Miravent, Carmen Jiménez, Narciso Barbancho, Manuel Duarte Lobo, Teresa Figueiredo, Carla Gomes, Ion Ratusneac, João Mário Gonçalves, Corina Hasnas, Rui de Almeida Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences.2025; 72(1): 8. CrossRef
Enhancing clinical outcomes: Point of care ultrasound in the precision diagnosis and Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in emergency medicine: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Eman E. Shaban, Yavuz Yigit, Baha Alkahlout, Ahmed Shaban, Amira Shaban, Benny Ponappan, Mohammed Abdurabu, Hany A. Zaki Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.2025; 53(2): 325. CrossRef
A Mixed Reality–Based Telesupervised Ultrasound Education Platform on 5G Network Compared to Direct Supervision: Prospective Randomized Pilot Trial Minha Kim, Meong Hi Son, Suhyeon Moon, Won Chul Cha, Ik Joon Jo, Hee Yoon JMIR Serious Games.2025; 13: e63448. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Achalasia Utilizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS): A Case Report Yupas Linn, Phyu Phyu Han, Kian Chai Lim, Vui H Chong Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Venous excess ultrasound: A mini-review and practical guide for its application in critically ill patients Wei Ven Chin, Melissa Mei Ing Ngai, Kay Choong See World Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Transformative impact of point-of-care testing in critical care Pradeep K Dabla, Aashima Dabas World Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
A scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence in point-of-care ultrasound: Current clinical applications Junu Kim, Sandhya Maranna, Caterina Watson, Nayana Parange The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 92: 172. CrossRef
Comparison of Airway Ultrasound and Conventional Methods in Airway Management: Effectiveness and Temporal Efficiency in Traumatic Patients in Emergency Department Vijay Kumar SS, Pranup Roshan Quadras, Sofiya Crastha, Anila Jose National Journal of Medical Research.2025; 15(02): 109. CrossRef
Knowledge and Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Prehospital Emergency Care in Portugal Raquel Pereira, Pedro Lito, Renato Gonçalves Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Using ChatGPT to assist in judging the indications for emergency ultrasound: an innovative exploration of optimizing medical resource allocation Zhirong Xu, Jiayi Ye, Jiemin Chen, Xiaoqian Zhang, Jiawei Wang Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Augmented Reality-aided Rescue Ultrasound Curriculum for Perioperative Crisis Management Peva F. Gbagornah, Chau Tran, Jacqueline Hannan, Shirin Saeed, Nadav Levy, Christopher Kim, Dario Winterton, Aidan Sharkey, Sara Neves, John Mitchell, Huma S. Hussain, Feroze U. Mahmood, Robina Matyal, Cullen D. Jackson, Ruma Bose Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.2025; 39(11): 3020. CrossRef
Evolving role of point-of-care ultrasound in prehospital emergency care: a narrative review Katharina E. M. Hellenthal, Christian Porschen, Jan Wnent, Matthias Lange Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Evolving Role of Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Emergencies: A Narrative Review Ahmed Saad Al Zomia, Asma Sulaiman Hassan Alshahrani, Abdullrahman Alshahrani, Mohammed Nasser M Alahmari, Saleh Saeed Al Jathnan Al Qahtani, Ahmad Mohammad Althawaby, Abdulrahman Asiri, Mazen Al Qahtani, Suleiman Alburidy, Ahad Essa Mohammed Asiri Clinical Ophthalmology.2025; Volume 19: 2691. CrossRef
Validation of a Newly Developed Assessment Tool for Point-of-Care Ultrasound of the Thorax in Healthy Volunteers (VALPOCUS) Patrick Hoffmann, Tobias Hüppe, Nicolas Poncelet, Julius J. Weise, Ulrich Berwanger, David Conrad Tomography.2025; 11(9): 97. CrossRef
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Intensive Care Unit Nurses Regarding Critical Care Ultrasound: A Cross‐Sectional Study in Southwestern China Lin Yang, Lei Lei, Shuai Zhang, Xia Zhang, Min Xu Nursing in Critical Care.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond the Workshop: Boosting Nurse Practitioner Confidence in Ultrasound John Barrett, Frances S. Shofer, Gwen Baraniecki-Zwil, Kyle Flattery, Christy Moore, Nova Panebianco The Journal for Nurse Practitioners.2025; 21(10): 105527. CrossRef
Determination of the Optimal Landmark for Tube Thoracostomy in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Study Mina Lee, Jaeik Jang, Jae-Hyug Woo, Hyuk Jun Yang, Woo Sung Choi, Jae Ho Jang, Sung Youl Hyun Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(21): 7571. CrossRef
AI-driven carotid artery compressibility assessment via point-of-care ultrasound for blood pressure estimation in critically ill and post-resuscitation patients: a prospective observational study Seung Jin Maeng, Subin Park, Ik Joon Jo, Guntak Lee, Sung Yeon Hwang, Myung Jin Chung, Jihyeon Kim, Hakje Yoo, Hee Yoon Critical Care.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Pulmonary Embolism Presenting as ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of Two Cases Anthony J Dina, Sherell Hicks Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of carotid artery compressibility via point-of-care ultrasound in determining the return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation Subin Park, Hee Yoon, Soo Yeon Kang, Ik Joon Jo, Sejin Heo, Hansol Chang, Jong Eun Park, Guntak Lee, Taerim Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Soyoung Park, Myung Jin Chung Resuscitation.2024; 202: 110302. CrossRef
Assessing Point-of-care Ultrasound Knowledge and Utilization among Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey Khalid Nabeel Almulhim, Razan Anwar Alabdulqader, Mohammed Khalid Alghamd, Alwaleed A Alqarni, Farah M Althikrallah, Ahmed A Alarfaj Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2024; 28(8): 769. CrossRef
Point of care ultrasound for triage of critically ill patients in the emergency department Harish Kinni, Samuel Garcia, Christopher Clark Journal of Translational Critical Care Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient satisfaction using handheld ultrasound at emergency department in Jordan University Hospital Ihab Alasasfeh, Yousef Almashakbeh, Shadin Jwaifel, Farah AlSheikh, Hiba Mihyar, Nansi M. Abdelrahim International Journal of Emergency Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) in Geisinger Health System William Adams, Ene C Chukwuemeka, Calvin Kiniale, Jennifer Bekker, Hugh Johnson, Mathangi Rajaram-Gilkes Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Cardiac Arrest: A Case Report Janete Henriques, Inês Pestana, Luís Pedro, José Sousa, Humberto Machado Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Sung Phil Chung, Youdong Sohn, Jisook Lee, Youngsuk Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Ai-Rhan Ellen Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Han-Suk Kim, Hyungoo Shin, Chiwon Ahn, Ho Geol Woo, Byung Kook Lee, Yong Soo Jang, Yu Hyeon Choi, Sung Oh Hwang, on behalf of the Guideline Committee of the Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (KACPR)
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2023;10(4):382-392. Published online August 25, 2023
Considerable evidence has been published since the 2020 Korean Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Guidelines were reported. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) also publishes the Consensus on CPR and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) summary annually. This review provides expert opinions by reviewing the recent evidence on CPR and ILCOR treatment recommendations. The authors reviewed the CoSTR summary published by ILCOR in 2021 and 2022. PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions for each topic were reviewed using a systemic or scoping review methodology. Two experts were appointed for each question and reviewed the topic independently. Topics suggested by the reviewers for revision or additional description of the guidelines were discussed at a consensus conference. Forty-three questions were reviewed, including 15 on basic life support, seven on advanced life support, two on pediatric life support, 11 on neonatal life support, six on education and teams, one on first aid, and one related to COVID-19. Finally, the current Korean CPR Guideline was maintained for 28 questions, and expert opinions were suggested for 15 questions.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Bystander interventions and clinical outcomes among adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims in South Korea over a decade: Sex-based disparities Kyung Hun Yoo, Jaehoon Oh, Tae Ho Lim, Hyunggoo Kang, Byuk Sung Ko, Yongil Cho, Juncheol Lee Public Health.2025; 242: 7. CrossRef
A critical reappraisal of vasopressin and steroids in in-hospital cardiac arrest Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos, Athanasios Chalkias Critical Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of post-cardiac arrest syndrome Mi-Jin Lee Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2023; 66(9): 545. CrossRef
First
Prev
