Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CEEM : Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

5
results for

"Analgesia"

Article category

Publication year

Keywords

"Analgesia"

Original Articles

Toxicology

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Association of acute opioid-induced euphoria and analgesia with subsequent opioid prescriptions in an emergency department–based prospective cohort study
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2026;13(2):207-212.   Published online December 2, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Association of acute opioid-induced euphoria and analgesia with subsequent opioid prescriptions in an emergency department–based prospective cohort study
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2026;13(2):207-212.   Published online December 2, 2025
Close
Objective
Emergency physicians have become hesitant to treat patients with opioids because of downstream sequelae related to opioid use disorder. We enrolled a prospective cohort to determine whether the experience of a patient receiving an intravenous (IV) opioid was associated with multiple opioid prescriptions. Specifically, we tested whether greater improvements in pain and a larger euphoric response could predict which previously opioid-naive patients exposed to IV opioids would fill at least two opioid prescriptions in the subsequent 6 months. Methods We recorded pain scores (range, 0–10) before and 15 minutes after opioid-naive emergency department patients were given IV opioids to manage severe pain. We also determined opioid-induced euphoria (range, 0–10 points) by querying how good, how high, how much euphoria the opioid caused, and how likely the participant was to want the opioid again. Sixmonth outcomes were ascertained using the state prescription monitoring database. Results Among 506 patients, 32 (6.3%) filled at least two prescriptions during the 6 months following the emergency department visit. TThere were no differences between those who filled ≥2 prescriptions and those who did not with regard to pain relief (P=0.54), how good the medication made participants feel (P=0.91), how high the medication made participants feel (P=0.97), how much euphoria the opioid caused (P=0.23), or how likely the participant was to want the medication again (P=0.37). Conclusion Filling at least two opioid prescriptions was uncommon after initial exposure to therapeutic IV opioids and was unrelated to either analgesic efficacy or opioid-induced euphoria.
  • 1,076 View
  • 55 Download

Pain Management & Sedation

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparison of the efficacy of bolus low-dose ketamine versus bolus plus infusion low-dose ketamine on pain management in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025;12(3):259-266.   Published online January 14, 2025
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparison of the efficacy of bolus low-dose ketamine versus bolus plus infusion low-dose ketamine on pain management in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2025;12(3):259-266.   Published online January 14, 2025
Close
Objective
Ketamine is a promising drug for analgesia in emergency medicine, but the high rate of side effects is a barrier to widespread usage. We hypothesized that ketamine bolus followed by ketamine infusion would provide a more even and longer duration of analgesia and lower rates of side effects in comparison to bolus-only administration.
Methods
This was a double-blinded clinical trial. Eligible trauma patients were randomly allocated with the numeric rating scale ≥6 in two study groups. The first group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of saline 0.9% over the next 30 minutes (bolus-only group). The second group was given 0.15 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg over the next 30 minutes (bolus-and-infusion group). The primary outcome was to measure the average reduction in pain scores.
Results
In total, 80 patients were recruited. Of these, 77 patients were analyzed. Both groups achieved a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (all P<0.001). After 30 minutes, patients in the bolus-and-infusion group reported lower pain scores in all intervals with lower rates of need for rescue analgesia, but this difference was not statistically significant. Vital signs remained stable during the study in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups for any side effect (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Both administration protocols resulted in significant pain control. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Updated European Society for Emergency Medicine Guidelines for acute pain management in emergency departments and prehospital care
    Saïd Hachimi-Idrissi, Viliam Dobias, Wolf E. Hautz, Robert Leach, Carlos Lojo Rial, Thomas C. Sauter, Idanna Sforzi, Frank Coffey
    European Journal of Emergency Medicine.2026; 33(3): 152.     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review of Low-Dose Ketamine for Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Department
    Nasser Almulhim, Abdullah Alibrahim, Ali Alajwad, Hanan Alzahrani, Ibrahim Aldandan, Abdulelah Aldabbab, Ahmad Aljaziri, Mayar Ibrahim
    Psychoactives.2026; 5(2): 15.     CrossRef
  • 6,312 View
  • 120 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref

Procedures | Pain Management & Sedation

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Femoral nerve blocks versus standard pain control for hip fractures: a retrospective comparative analysis
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024;11(2):181-187.   Published online January 29, 2024
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Femoral nerve blocks versus standard pain control for hip fractures: a retrospective comparative analysis
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024;11(2):181-187.   Published online January 29, 2024
Close
Objective
Pain control for hip fractures is often achieved via intravenous opioids. However, opioids can have dangerous adverse effects, including respiratory depression and delirium. Peripheral nerve blockade is an alternative option for pain control that reduces the need for opioid analgesia. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of femoral nerve blocks versus standard pain control for patients with hip fractures. Methods This retrospective study included adult patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated hip fractures between April 2021 and September 2022. The intervention group included all patients who received a femoral nerve block during this time. An equivalent number of patients who received standard pain control during that period was randomly selected to represent the control group. The primary outcome was preoperative opioid requirement, assessed by morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Results During the study period, 90 patients were included in each group. Mean preoperative MME was 10.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4–13.2 MME) for the intervention group and 14.0 (95% CI, 10.2–17.8 MME) for the control group (P=0.13). Patients who received a femoral nerve block also had shorter time from emergency department triage to hospital discharge (7.2 days; 95% CI, 6.2–8.0 days) than patients who received standard care (8.6 days; 95% CI, 7.210.0 days). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.09). Conclusion Femoral nerve blockade is a safe and effective alternative to opioids for pain control in patients with hip fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Femoral Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Pain Management in Emergency Department Patients with Extracapsular Hip Fractures
    Kar Mun Cheong, Hua Li, Su Weng Chau, Cheng-Han Chiang, Yi-Kung Lee, Tou-Yuan Tsai
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(4): 1454.     CrossRef
  • Femoral Nerve Block: A Review of the Relevant Applied Anatomy, Anatomical Variations, and Procedural Considerations
    Yuqian Dai, Michael J. Montalbano, Ewarld Marshall, Marios Loukas
    Clinical Anatomy.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block versus intravenous analgesia in geriatric hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials demonstrating superior pain control
    Chang Liu, Shunyu Han, Ai Wei, Lina Yang, Mengchang Yang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13,375 View
  • 161 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Case Report

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Anterior cutaneous nerve block for analgesia in anterior chest trauma: is the parasternal approach necessary?
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7(1):67-70.   Published online March 31, 2020
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Anterior cutaneous nerve block for analgesia in anterior chest trauma: is the parasternal approach necessary?
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020;7(1):67-70.   Published online March 31, 2020
Close
In recent years, several techniques of regional anesthesia have been proposed to provide analgesia to the anterior thoracic cage; notably, most of these techniques require a parasternal approach. However, in this context, the potential role of a more common and well-established technique, namely the modified pectoral nerve block (known as PECS II block), has been poorly investigated. Here, we describe a case involving a patient with bilateral anterolateral multiple rib fractures associated with sternum fracture, who was successfully treated using bilateral PECS II blocks. Our experience indicates that the PECS II block can provide excellent analgesia in cases involving anterior rib and sternum fractures. Because it is easier to perform and may be safer than other parasternal techniques, the PECS II block should be considered when providing analgesia for traumatic injuries of the anterior thorax.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Use of fascial plane blocks for traumatic rib fractures: a scoping review
    Ahtsham U Niazi, Max Solish, Aneurin Moorthy, Faizan Niazi, Antonio Hermes Abate, Catherine Devion, Stephen Choi
    Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.2026; 51(4): 414.     CrossRef
  • Differences in opioid analgesic practices between emergency medicine specialists and general practitioners: a cross-sectional study
    Mustafa Öcal
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2026; 21(2): 549.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in a Resource-Limited Hospital: Prospective Pilot Study of a Hybrid Training Program
    Jakob E Gamboa, Inge Tamm-Daniels, Roland Flores, Nancy G Sarat Diaz, Mario A Villasenor, Mitchell A Gist, Aidan B Hoie, Christopher Kurinec, Colby G Simmons
    JMIR Medical Education.2026; 12: e84181.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rib Fracture Pain
    Bing-Hua Lin, Hui-Min Huang, Sheng-Feng Lin
    The Clinical Journal of Pain.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • When Regional Anesthesia is Mistaken for Pain Medicine: The Importance of Etiology-Driven Interventional Pain Management
    Giuliano Lo Bianco, Laura Demartini, Marco Mercieri, Michael Schatman
    Journal of Pain Research.2026; Volume 19: 1.     CrossRef
  • Evolution of simulation-based training in Italian emergency medicine residency programs: results from a national longitudinal survey (2022–2024)
    Giulia Mormando, Michela Cascio, Monica Di Cristoforo, Gianpiero Zaccaria, Bruno Barcella, Valentina Angeli, Sofia Pons, Pier Luigi Ingrassia
    Emergency Care Journal.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of a rib fracture management pathway in an Australian tertiary trauma hospital
    Craig Morrison, Kiara Song, Tim Soon Cheok, Sean Liew, Rohen Skiba, Greg Rice, Ruurd L Jaarsma, Hidde M Kroon, D-Yin Lin
    Journal of International Medical Research.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Acute pain management of rib fractures: a narrative review
    Thomas Ulrich Bresgen, Francesco Salinaro, Bruno Barcella, Stefano Perlini, Ilenia Mascherona, Santi Di Pietro
    Injury.2025; 56(12): 112857.     CrossRef
  • Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing on Safety and Complications. Part 1 Injections for Spinal Pain
    Giuliano Lo Bianco, Andrea Tinnirello, Alfonso Papa, Vito Torrano, Gianluca Russo, Agnes Stogicza, Sebastiano Mercadante, Andrea Cortegiani, Silvia Mazzoleni, Michael E Schatman
    Journal of Pain Research.2023; Volume 16: 1637.     CrossRef
  • Current Review of Analgesia and Regional Anesthesia Practices for Rib Fracture and Chest Wall Trauma
    Paul D. Piennette, Sara Elizabeth Morris, Theresa Northern
    Current Anesthesiology Reports.2022; 12(3): 407.     CrossRef
  • Regional Anesthesia for Trauma in the Emergency Department
    Nadia Hernandez, Johanna B. de Haan
    Current Anesthesiology Reports.2022; 12(2): 240.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral PECS II Block is Associated with Decreased Opioid Consumption and Reduced Pain Scores for up to 24 hours After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum (Nuss Procedure): A Retrospective Analysis
    Gokhan Sertcakacilar, Selcuk Kose
    Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.2022; 36(10): 3833.     CrossRef
  • 8,209 View
  • 142 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Original Article

Pain Management & Sedation

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3(2):105-108.   Published online June 30, 2016
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;3(2):105-108.   Published online June 30, 2016
Close
Objective
To evaluate intravenous lidocaine’s safety and efficacy as an analgesic agent in the treatment of a variety of painful conditions presenting to the emergency department.
Methods
This case series identified seventeen patients who received lidocaine over a six month period and recorded demographic data, amount of lidocaine administered, the amount of opioid medication administered before and after lidocaine, pre- and post-lidocaine pain scores, and any qualitative descriptors of the patient’s pain recorded in the record. Side effects and adverse events were also recorded.
Results
Of the seven patients who had a pre- and post-lidocaine pain score recorded, the mean reduction was 3 points on a 10 point scale. Patients who received lidocaine used less opioid medication. One patient received an improperly high dose of lidocaine and suffered a brief seizure and cardiac arrest, but was quickly resuscitated.
Conclusion
This series suggests that lidocaine may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of acutely painful conditions in the emergency department.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Acute pain management in older adults presenting to the emergency department: a clinical review
    Sirasa Kampan, Kwannapa Thong-on, Kanokporn Pongvirat, Monalin Veeraditthakij, Jiraporn Sri-on
    Singapore Medical Journal.2026; 67(4): 211.     CrossRef
  • LidocAine Versus Opioids In MyocarDial infarction: the AVOID-2 randomized controlled trial
    Himawan Fernando, Ziad Nehme, Catherine Milne, Jessica O’Brien, Stephen Bernard, Michael Stephenson, Paul S Myles, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Karlheinz Peter, Angela Brennan, Diem Dinh, Emily Andrew, Andrew J Taylor, Karen Smith, Dion Stub
    European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care.2023; 12(1): 2.     CrossRef
  • Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusions as Adjunctive Pain Management Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients Admitted for Pain Related to Sickle Cell Disease
    Nicolas A. Zavala, Randall W. Knoebel, Magdalena Anitescu
    Frontiers in Pain Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of intravenous lidocaine and its side effects in comparison with intravenous morphine sulfate in patients admitted to the ED with right upper abdominal pain suspected of biliary colic
    Atousa Akhgar, Tayebe Pouryousefi, Amir Nejati, Hosein Rafiemanesh, Hooman Hossein-nejad
    The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 44: 300.     CrossRef
  • Updates in our understanding of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity: a narrative review
    A. J. R. Macfarlane, M. Gitman, K. J. Bornstein, K. El‐Boghdadly, G. Weinberg
    Anaesthesia.2021; 76(S1): 27.     CrossRef
  • An open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of lidocAine Versus Opioids In MyocarDial Infarction study (AVOID-2 study) methods paper
    Himawan Fernando, Catherine Milne, Ziad Nehme, Jocasta Ball, Stephen Bernard, Michael Stephenson, Paul S. Myles, Janet E. Bray, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Danny Liew, Karlheinz Peter, Angela Brennan, Diem Dinh, Emily Andrew, Andrew J. Taylor, Karen Smith, Dion St
    Contemporary Clinical Trials.2021; 105: 106411.     CrossRef
  • Intravenous, Perioperatively Administered Lidocaine Regulates Serum Pain Modulators’ Concentrations in Children Undergoing Spinal Surgery
    Barbara Kościelniak-Merak, Ilona Batko, Krzysztof Kobylarz, Krystyna Sztefko, Przemysław J Tomasik
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(7): 1464.     CrossRef
  • Analgesia in acute ischemic chest pain
    Wenjiang Yan, Shaozhong Yang, Liang Chen, Jingjing Yang
    Coronary Artery Disease.2020; 31(6): 556.     CrossRef
  • Opioids and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
    Ji Quan Samuel Koh, Himawan Fernando, Karlheinz Peter, Dion Stub
    Heart, Lung and Circulation.2019; 28(5): 697.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Intravenous, Perioperative-Administrated Lidocaine on Postoperative Serum Levels of Endogenous Opioids in Children
    Barbara Kościelniak-Merak, Ilona Batko, Krzysztof Kobylarz, Krystyna Sztefko, Magdalena Kocot-Kępska, Przemysław J. Tomasik
    Current Pharmaceutical Design.2019; 25(30): 3209.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Intravenous Lidocaine for the Management of Acute Pain Secondary to Traumatic Ankle Injury: A Case Report
    Billy Sin, Diana Gritsenko, Grace Tam, Kimberly Koop, Eva Mok
    Journal of Pharmacy Practice.2018; 31(1): 126.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Pain Management in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review
    Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva, Kristin Scherber, Daniel Cabrera, Sergey Motov, Patricia J. Erwin, Colin P. West, M. Hassan Murad, M. Fernanda Bellolio
    Annals of Emergency Medicine.2018; 72(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • 18,471 View
  • 305 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref