Steroids are used in cases of sepsis, especially in patients experiencing septic shock. However, clinical trials to date have reported contradictory results. Different patient endotypes and variations in the type and dose of steroid may be at fault for this discrepancy, and further investigation is warranted. In this paper, we propose a new DEXA-SEPSIS study design.
We plan to conduct a multicenter, double-blinded randomized pilot study (DEXA-SEPSIS) investigating the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in sepsis. Participants will be high-risk septic patients presenting to the emergency department with a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or serum lactate level of >2 mmol/L. Participants will be randomized to the following three groups: control, 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone, or 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone per day for 1 to 2 days. The primary outcome will be 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes will include time to septic shock, shock reversal, additional steroid administration, number of ventilator-free days, use of continuous renal-replacement therapy, length of stay in the intensive care unit and/or hospital, delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on days 3 and 7, superinfection, gastrointestinal bleeding, hypernatremia, and hyperglycemia.
The DEXA-SEPSIS study will provide insight regarding the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in high-risk sepsis. The results could provide data to design a future phase III study.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05136560
Steroids are being used in cases of sepsis, especially in patients with septic shock. However, clinical trials to date have reported contradictory results.
We propose a new phase IIa study protocol to use dexamethasone in early high-risk sepsis in the emergency department.
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening type of organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host responses to infection [
Low-dose steroids are recommended by current guidelines in cases of septic shock requiring ongoing vasopressor therapy, but the evidence in support of this approach is weak [
Historically, high-dose steroids have been used to treat sepsis, but no ultimate survival gains have been reported in the literature as a result of this approach [
Considering these results, we hypothesized that the effect of steroids on sepsis might differ according to the steroid dosage and the severity and phase of sepsis. In a pilot study investigating the validity of this hypothesis, we plan to assess the effect of early bolus administration of different doses of dexamethasone in high-risk septic patients.
This study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of CHA Bundang Medical Center (No. CHA 2021-02-035), the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (No. SMC-2021-03-078), and the Korean Food and Drug Agency.
The proposed study is a multicenter double-blinded randomized phase IIa pilot clinical trial that will be undertaken at two academic emergency departments in Korea. The trial protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) statement.
The definition of sepsis in this study will rely on the sepsis-3 definition, which contends that sepsis is a life-threatening type of organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Organ dysfunction can be identified as an acute change in the total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of ≥2 points consequent to the infection. High-risk sepsis patients are defined as sepsis patients with a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or serum lactate level of >2 mmol/L.
Adverse events will be defined as all adverse events that occur after a study participant is given the study drug. The causality between the events and the study drug does not need to be clear, but events considered as part of the clinical course of sepsis will be excluded.
Renal replacement therapy will be defined in this study as therapy for patients with kidney failure that replaces the blood-filtering function of the kidneys.
Time to shock reversal will be defined in this study as the time (in hours) from a state of shock to shock reversal. A state of shock will be defined in this study as a condition that requires a vasopressor to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg. Shock reversal will be defined in this study as a point at which the mean arterial pressure had remained >60 mmHg without any vasopressor and 24 hours have passed.
Ventilator-free days will be calculated as follows: 1 point for each day during the measurement period where patients are both alive and free from mechanical ventilation. The total number of ventilator-free days will be measured for up to 3 months during the hospital stay.
Patients visiting the emergency departments of CHA Bundang Medical Center and Samsung Medical Center who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria may be enrolled in this study (
The present study will be conducted in two emergency departments in Seongnam and Seoul, Korea. We plan to enroll 30 patients in each group, for a total of 90 patients (
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups as follows: a control group (placebo), a 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone bolus group, and a 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone bolus group. The treatment groups will receive their allotted dexamethasone bolus amounts once per day for 1 to 2 days (
Patients will be allocated to receive a bolus injection of either the intervention (0.1 mg/kg or 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone) or identical placebo (0.9% saline). The study infusion package will contain four ampules, each of which has 1 mL of content. The package of the 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone group consists of four ampules of dexamethasone, while the package of the 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone group consists of two ampules of dexamethasone and two ampules of normal saline; lastly, the package of the placebo group consists of four ampules of normal saline. All ampules will be opened and mixed with 6 mL of normal saline to create 10 mL of the study drug, and a volume of 0.1 times the patient’s body weight will be injected to administer an appropriate dose of the drug while retaining the study blinding.
The appearance of the study infusion packages will be identical and there will be no markings on the package other than a four-digit code identifying the study number. Administration of the study drug could be repeated once in a 24-hour interval if there is no other routine use of steroids at the discretion of the treating physician.
Known management options for sepsis, e.g., fluid, antibiotics, vasopressors, and respiratory care, should be used at the discretion of the treating physician. The use of steroids for the standard treatment of sepsis is possible without unblinding. However, the administration of etomidate during hospitalization will require the withdrawal of the patient from the study.
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) via computer-generated permuted block randomization (block size of 3 and 6 to achieve between-group balance) to receive 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone, 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone, or a placebo. The randomization table will be prepared by a statistician working independently of the study. The investigators, research coordinators, treating physicians, nurses, and patients/family members will remain blinded to the allocated group.
The SOFA score and lactate level will be recorded before study enrollment. Then, during the study period, data will be acquired according to a predefined schedule (
Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed by a group-blinded research coordinator. Patient electronic medical records will be used to assess the outcomes, and final outcomes, such as 28-day or 90-day mortality, will be determined on the basis of medical records and telephone interviews.
The primary outcome will be 28-day mortality (
Secondary outcomes will include 90-day all-cause mortality, time to septic shock, shock reversal, number of vasopressor-free days, use of continuous renal-replacement therapy, additional steroid administration, number of ventilator-free days, length of stay in the intensive care unit and/or hospital, delta SOFA score on days 3 and 7, superinfection (defined as a secondary infection within 28 days), gastrointestinal bleeding within 14 days, hyperglycemia (defined by a serum glucose level of >150 mg/dL within 7 days), and hypernatremia (defined by a serum sodium level of >150 mmol/L within 7 days).
Primary data will be analyzed by intention-to-treat analysis. Data will also be presented stratified by center and the severity of septic shock according to the use of vasopressors. The statistical analysis will be performed by an independent and blinded statistician. Descriptive data will be presented using median and interquartile range values or mean±standard deviation values, as appropriate. Treatment groups will be compared using the chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, one-way analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc analysis.
A Kaplan-Meier survival curve with the log-rank test will be used in the time-to-event analysis. Multiple testing corrections will be performed with the Bonferroni method. Since this is a phase IIa study, a sample size calculation will not be required. The sample size would be 102 patients, considering a dropout rate of 10% and allocation of 30 patients to each group.
P<0.05 will be considered statistically significant, and all statistical analyses will be two-sided. All analyses will be performed using R ver. 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Stata ver. 17.0 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA).
The data safety and monitoring board for this study will be composed of two clinicians and one statistician working independently of this study. These individuals will verify adherence to trial procedures and the accuracy of data collection according to national and international requirements and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. This assessment will be performed on a monthly basis by each participating center. They will check the case report forms and verify they are consistent with the source of documentation. They will also confirm that the study process complies with the study protocol.
The current guideline about sepsis suggests using intravenous corticosteroids for adults with septic shock and an ongoing requirement for vasopressor therapy [
The results of this phase II study could lead to the design, development, and conduct of a phase III trial powered to evaluate the effects of the use of early dexamethasone in high-risk sepsis patients.
Kyuseok Kim serves as an editor of the
This study was supported by Samsung Medical Center Grant (No. SMO1220361).
DEXA-SEPSIS study flow. DEX, dexamethasone.
Blinded technique. NS, normal saline; IP, investigational product; DEX, dexamethasone.
Primary and secondary outcomes. ICU, intensive care unit; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
DEXA-SEPSIS study inclusion and exclusion criteria
DEXA-SEPSIS study inclusion and exclusion criteria | |
---|---|
Inclusion criteria |
Age of 19–89 years |
Systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or plasma lactate level of >2 mmol/L | |
Delta SOFA score of ≥2 points consequent to the infection | |
Exclusion critiera |
Decision to limit or withdraw active treatment (i.e., do not resuscitate) |
Steroid use within 4 weeks | |
Chemotherapy for underlying malignancy within 4 weeks | |
Immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks | |
Underlying disease with a life expectancy of <90 days | |
Patient was hospitalized at another hospital for sepsis and referred (not including those transferred from another ED) | |
Sepsis diagnosed 24 hours after ED admission | |
Etomidate use during hospitalization | |
Pregnancy or lactation | |
Informed written consent cannot be obtained from a patient or legal representative | |
Any other condition considered harmful in conjunction with the use of steroids by the physician |
SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; ED, emergency department.
All of the following inclusion criteria must be met.
The patient will be excluded if ≥1 of the following exclusion criteria are present.
Study schedule
Period | Screening |
Treatment |
Follow-up |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
- | Day 0 | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7a) | Day 14a) | Month 1a) | Month 3b) | |
Written consent | √ | |||||||
Screening numbering | √ | |||||||
Demographic survey | √ | |||||||
Medical history | √ | |||||||
Physical examination | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Vital sign measurement | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Laboratory test | √ | |||||||
Blood culture | √ | |||||||
SOFA score | √ | √ | √ | |||||
Eligible criteria check | √ | |||||||
Randomization | √ | |||||||
Administration of clinical investigational drug | √ | √ | ||||||
Check for adverse effects | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Confirmation of concomitant drugs and treatment | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
Window period of a)±3 and b)±5 days.