Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Hajung Yoon; Yunhyung Kwon; Juyeon An; Sungok Hong; Young Taek Kim

doi:10.15441/ceem.18.074

Articles

Page Path

Editorial

Resuscitation

Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Hajung Yoon, Yunhyung Kwon, Juyeon An, Sungok Hong, Young Taek Kim

Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2019;6(2):183-188.
Published online: June 28, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.18.074

Division of Chronic Disease Control, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cheongju, Korea

Correspondence to: Young Taek Kim Division of Chronic Disease Control, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju 28159, Korea E-mail: ruyoung@korea.kr

This article is based on a study reported initially in “Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006-2016 Sudden Cardiac Arrest Statistics. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017.”

• Received: April 16, 2018 • Revised: September 12, 2018 • Accepted: September 26, 2019

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

7,018 Views
102 Download
9 Web of Science
8 Crossref
8 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

STRUCTURE OF THE SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST SURVEY
INCIDENCE OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST AND SURVIVAL STATUS
STATUS OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARRESTS IN EACH REGION
NOTES
REFERENCES

STRUCTURE OF THE SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST SURVEY

The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) performs various tasks related to public health and epidemiology, including the planning and administration of medical record surveys, assurance of data quality, standardization of survey questions and guidelines, analysis of results, production of main indices, and publication of statistics. The National Cardiac Arrest Survey and Monitoring Advisory Committee comprises specialists in related departments and academic institutions. This committee provides technical assistance and advice regarding the maintenance of a survey-monitoring system, development of questionnaires, and review and analysis of results with the intent to support policy development and stimulate research. These works are conducted in cooperation with the National Fire Agency, 17 “Si (cities)-Do (provinces)” Fire and Disaster Headquarter centers, and approximately 600 medical institutions. From the rescue activity records of the “Si–Do” Fire and Disaster Headquarters, which are provided by the National Fire Agency, the KCDC selects cases involving sudden cardiac arrest, standardizes the names of hospitals to which patients are transferred, and establishes a surveillance database. Subsequently, dedicated survey personnel employed by the KCDC visit approximately 600 hospitals identified as receiving transferred patients and survey the pertinent medical records. All involved hospitals cooperate actively with this work (Fig. 1).

INCIDENCE OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST AND SURVIVAL STATUS

The number of cases of sudden cardiac arrest increased by 1.5-fold from 19,480 in 2006 to 29,832 in 2016, while the standardized incidence rate increased by 1.1-fold from 39.3 (per 100,000 population) to 41.5 during the same period (Fig. 2). The demographic features of cardiac arrest patients also changed with the overall demographic structure during the 11-year study period, as demonstrated by the sharp increase in the proportion of elderly patients (aged ≥70 years) from 38.7% in 2006 to 49.5% in 2016. Similarly, the proportion of arrests attributed to “disease” increased. The rates of survival and neurological recovery increased each year, with the former increasing by 3.3-fold from 2.3% in 2006 to 7.6% in 2016 (Fig. 3). Regarding the latter, the proportion of patients who neurologically recovered sufficiently to achieve independence with tasks of daily living increased by 7-fold, from 0.6% in 2006 to 4.2% in 2016. Improved survival and neurological recovery also rely on the rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by non-medical personnel (i.e., a layperson). Notably, this rate increased significantly from 1.9% in 2008 to 16.8% in 2016, and the annual trend continues to increase (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, an indicator of the paramedics’ capability, also increased by 7.7-fold from 0.9% in 2006 to 6.9% in 2016.

STATUS OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARRESTS IN EACH REGION

Large disparities in the values of major indices associated with sudden cardiac arrest were observed among regions. Although the underlying cause remains unclear, the tendency of these disparities to increase highlights the need to produce relevant indices, and the data needs to be provided to the communities for local cooperation in the developement and implementation of effective policies. Notably, increases in regional disparities were observed both in the rate of CPR performed by a layperson and the rate of return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival, and trends toward increasing regional disparities were observed in the rates of survival and neurological recovery, an indicator of treatment results. These disparities also increased with respect to the type of city. For example, Seoul, which is unique among the various city types, exhibited better overall performances and magnitudes of improvement with respect to survival and neurological recovery, compared to other city types (Tables 1, 2).

The timely administration of treatment is crucial during a sudden cardiac arrest, and patient prognosis improves only in the presence of effective and organic flow between different strata (i.e., regional society, emergency response, and hospital stages). Therefore, the survival rate following sudden cardiac arrest can be considered an indicator of a nation’s entire emergency medical system. The introduction of a sudden cardiac arrest survey program in 2008 enabled the objective assessment of issues related to sudden cardiac arrest and the generation of comparable regional statistics and individualized evidence-based policies. From this, we could confirm that overall survival of sudden cardiac arrests improved nationwide while regional disparities widened.

According to a recent study, the survival rate among cases of sudden cardiac arrest increased by 1.4-fold as the proportion of the population educated in CPR increased by 10% [1]. However, a community health survey (citizen health statistics) conducted annually by 254 community health centers as stated by community health law found that although the proportion of the overall population educated in CPR improved, regional disparities were apparent [2]. Accordingly, central and local governments should focus not only on improving overall survival nationwide, but should also reinforce policies that aim to reduce these widening gaps. Finally, we hope that the regional statistics yielded by the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Survey will promote initiatives aimed at improving the survival of community-dwelling patients who experience sudden cardiac arrest.

NOTES

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.

Sudden cardiac arrest survey system. KCDC, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Fig. 2.

Trends of sudden cardiac arrest.

Fig. 3.

Trends in survival rate and neurological recovery rate.

Fig. 4.

Trends in rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before hospital arrival.

Table 1.

Disparities in Sudden cardiac arrest survey main indices, 2006-2016

Table 1.
Index	Value	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
Rate of CPR performed by layperson (%)	Total	-	-	1.9	2.7	3.4	5.0	6.9	9.1	12.9	14.1	16.8
	Seoul	-	-	3.1	5.5	7.3	12.3	17.4	19.8	26.2	23.6	29.6
	Busan	-	-	1.6	1.7	1.6	4.6	4.8	7.0	9.9	11.2	13.3
	Daegu	-	-	1.6	3.0	4.1	5.5	6.1	9.6	12.9	18.3	23.6
	Incheon	-	-	2.4	4.9	5.3	6.2	6.9	8.0	14.6	13.0	16.6
	Gwangju	-	-	0.9	1.4	1.5	2.8	3.8	4.4	10.1	8.2	8.1
	Daejeon	-	-	1.5	1.7	2.3	3.9	4.6	9.1	16.2	14.4	20.8
	Ulsan	-	-	1.6	1.3	1.6	4.9	4.7	7.3	8.1	14.9	20.7
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	3.8	2.6	2.6	7.1	13.4
	Gyeonggi	-	-	2.2	2.7	4.0	5.1	6.8	8.5	12.6	16.3	18.9
	Gangwon	-	-	2.1	2.8	3.7	3.4	4.1	8.4	11.7	15.2	16.2
	Chungbuk	-	-	0.9	1.1	1.7	2.4	3.9	5.9	7.0	9.0	13.9
	Chungnam	-	-	1.5	1.2	2.8	3.3	4.4	6.6	9.3	8.4	12.1
	Jeonbuk	-	-	2.2	2.1	2.4	3.6	4.2	8.0	11.4	11.3	9.7
	Jeonnam	-	-	1.5	1.3	1.2	1.1	3.2	4.2	6.4	6.3	6.1
	Gyeongbuk	-	-	0.9	1.0	1.0	1.4	2.8	4.2	4.6	8.1	8.0
	Gyeongnam	-	-	0.6	1.8	1.3	3.2	4.7	6.2	8.2	9.7	11.5
	Jeju	-	-	1.4	2.5	1.9	3.5	5.4	8.5	11.7	17.9	17.0
	Disparity (max-min)	-	-	2.5	4.5	6.3	11.2	14.6	17.2	23.6	17.3	23.5
Rate of ROSC before hospital arrival (%)	Total	0.9	1.1	1.2	1.9	1.8	3.1	3.5	3.7	4.2	5.1	6.9
	Seoul	1.2	1.3	1.5	2.6	2.0	2.8	4.1	4.5	5.0	6.2	7.7
	Busan	0.9	0.8	1.7	2.3	2.0	3.0	4.6	5.1	5.6	6.7	10.2
	Daegu	1.3	0.4	0.6	1.6	2.2	3.6	3.3	4.7	4.3	5.6	9.0
	Incheon	0.3	1.1	1.9	1.8	2.0	3.8	3.3	3.8	5.0	5.5	7.5
	Gwangju	0.2	0.8	2.0	1.6	2.4	5.2	3.8	4.2	5.6	4.5	9.4
	Daejeon	0.4	1.1	1.4	1.2	3.0	3.9	3.1	5.6	4.8	4.3	7.3
	Ulsan	0.3	1.6	0.8	2.5	3.4	4.0	4.9	4.3	6.4	4.7	9.3
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	3.5	3.8	6.2	7.5	15.3
	Gyeonggi	1.3	1.4	1.3	1.9	1.8	3.0	3.9	3.4	4.6	5.8	8.4
	Gangwon	1.8	0.5	1.0	1.8	2.3	2.4	2.4	2.3	4.2	4.0	5.1
	Chungbuk	1.3	1.1	0.6	2.1	1.0	3.3	2.1	3.4	3.0	3.0	4.7
	Chungnam	0.8	1.4	0.4	1.5	1.0	4.4	3.0	2.5	2.3	2.6	5.8
	Jeonbuk	0.6	0.6	0.5	1.5	1.6	4.1	3.7	4.7	4.4	4.7	4.1
	Jeonnam	0.7	1.6	1.0	1.6	1.8	2.5	2.7	2.3	2.4	4.1	3.0
	Gyeongbuk	0.9	1.0	1.1	1.5	0.9	1.7	2.4	2.7	2.2	3.6	4.4
	Gyeongnam	0.4	0.4	0.8	1.8	1.4	2.5	2.5	2.9	3.2	4.6	5.1
	Jeju	0.7	1.2	1.2	2.6	1.6	4.9	5.5	3.9	3.3	5.1	5.1
	Disparity (max-min)	1.6	1.2	1.6	1.4	2.5	3.5	3.4	3.3	4.2	4.9	12.3
Survival rate (%)	Total	2.3	2.6	2.5	3.3	3.3	4.1	4.4	4.8	4.8	6.3	7.6
	Seoul	3.9	5.0	4.9	6.4	6.3	8.3	8.8	9.2	8.6	9.8	11.4
	Busan	0.6	2.0	2.0	3.5	3.6	4.5	4.4	5.3	5.7	7.6	9.1
	Daegu	2.2	1.3	1.7	2.4	2.4	3.7	4.7	6.1	5.4	5.1	7.0
	Incheon	4.3	3.9	4.5	4.1	4.0	5.8	5.3	6.7	5.8	7.2	8.2
	Gwangju	3.2	2.0	3.1	4.6	4.0	4.1	2.9	4.6	3.9	7.6	9.2
	Daejeon	4.4	3.9	4.2	4.2	8.1	6.6	6.8	7.9	7.3	7.1	8.4
	Ulsan	1.4	1.9	0.5	2.7	4.4	3.3	3.8	3.0	4.5	6.4	10.9
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	5.3	2.6	3.7	2.2	11.9
	Gyeonggi	3.0	3.4	2.8	3.7	3.3	4.0	4.8	4.8	5.7	6.8	8.2
	Gangwon	3.2	2.4	1.9	2.9	4.1	3.1	3.6	3.8	4.5	4.7	6.1
	Chungbuk	1.7	1.2	1.4	2.0	1.5	3.0	2.5	3.8	2.8	3.9	5.3
	Chungnam	0.3	0.7	0.7	1.2	0.7	2.5	2.6	1.9	1.9	3.5	6.1
	Jeonbuk	1.1	2.4	1.2	1.5	2.1	3.0	2.9	4.4	3.2	4.8	5.1
	Jeonnam	0.9	1.4	1.4	1.4	1.2	1.7	1.6	1.2	1.1	4.4	4.7
	Gyeongbuk	0.7	0.6	1.1	1.3	1.1	1.6	1.4	1.8	1.3	3.4	4.3
	Gyeongnam	0.2	0.5	1.9	1.8	1.1	1.6	2.1	2.3	2.6	4.5	5.5
	Jeju	1.4	2.7	1.8	3.2	2.8	3.5	4.6	3.6	3.6	7.4	6.2
	Disparity (max-min)	4.2	4.5	4.4	5.2	7.4	6.7	7.4	8.0	7.5	7.6	7.6
Neurological recovery rate (%)	Total	0.6	0.7	0.8	1.0	0.9	1.6	1.8	2.3	2.7	3.6	4.2
	Seoul	0.8	1.6	1.5	1.7	1.6	2.9	3.3	3.9	4.9	5.8	6.0
	Busan	0.0	0.4	0.3	1.2	0.8	1.9	2.2	3.0	3.1	4.6	5.3
	Daegu	1.1	0.0	0.9	1.1	1.2	2.2	2.3	3.9	3.7	3.7	5.4
	Incheon	1.0	1.1	0.8	1.3	1.4	2.1	2.2	3.0	3.8	3.8	4.5
	Gwangju	0.2	0.6	0.9	1.1	0.6	2.1	1.6	2.2	2.2	3.7	4.8
	Daejeon	1.6	1.5	1.4	0.3	1.4	2.9	1.9	3.8	3.3	3.9	4.0
	Ulsan	0.6	1.1	0.3	1.0	2.1	0.9	2.3	1.5	2.6	4.0	6.2
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.8	2.6	3.7	0.0	9.3
	Gyeonggi	0.8	0.8	0.9	0.9	1.0	1.3	2.1	2.4	2.8	3.8	4.6
	Gangwon	1.4	0.9	0.6	1.7	1.4	1.1	1.0	2.1	2.5	2.5	2.5
	Chungbuk	0.4	0.3	0.3	1.0	0.6	1.0	0.7	1.4	1.8	2.5	3.1
	Chungnam	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.1	1.1	1.2	0.8	0.9	1.9	2.9
	Jeonbuk	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.4	0.4	1.4	1.2	2.0	2.2	2.7	3.3
	Jeonnam	0.2	0.1	0.7	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.5	0.6	0.4	2.3	2.0
	Gyeongbuk	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.6	0.5	0.6	0.9	0.9	0.8	2.3	2.7
	Gyeongnam	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.5	0.4	0.7	1.1	1.5	1.8	2.7	3.1
	Jeju	0.5	1.4	0.9	1.7	1.2	2.8	2.7	2.0	2.2	4.6	3.7
	Disparity (max-min)	1.6	1.6	1.5	1.5	2.0	2.5	2.8	3.3	4.5	5.8	7.3

Unit: %, %p.

CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; -, null value.

Table 2.

Results of sudden cardiac arrest main indices and their disparities among city types, 2006-2016

Table 2.
Index	City type		2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
Rate of CPR performed by layperson (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city		-	-	3.1^a)	5.5^a)	7.3^a)	12.3^a)	17.4^a)	19.8^a)	26.2^a)	23.6^a)	29.6^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)		-	-	1.9	2.8	3.5	5.0	6.4	8.8	12.8	15.2	17.7
	Cities with less than 300,000 people		-	-	1.7	1.1^c)	1.7	2.3	4.3	5.5	10.4	11.4	15.9
	Urban rural consolidated cities		-	-	1.3	1.5	2.0	2.7	3.4	5.4	7.3	9.0	10.2
	Counties		-	-	1.1^c)	1.2	1.4^c)	1.8^c)	2.8^c)	4.4^c)	6.4^c)	7.7^c)	9.5^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		-	-	2.0	4.4	5.9	10.5	14.6	15.4	19.8	15.9	20.1
ROSC before hospital arrival (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city		1.2^a)	1.3	1.5^a)	2.6^a)	2.0	2.8	4.1^a)	4.5^a)	5.0^a)	6.2^a)	7.7
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)		0.9	1.0	1.3	1.9	1.9	3.4^a)	3.6	4.1	4.5	5.5	8.2^a)
	Cities with less than 300,000 people		0.9	1.5^a)	0.9^c)	1.8	2.1^a)	2.2^c)	3.7	3.0	4.2	5.6	6.1
	Urban rural consolidated cities		0.9	1.0^c)	1.0	1.7	1.6	2.9	2.9^c)	2.9	3.4	3.9	4.9
	Counties		0.7^c)	1.0^c)	0.9^c)	1.6^c)	1.2^c)	3.0	3.0	2.8^c)	3.1^c)	3.6^c)	4.7^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		0.5	0.5	0.6	1.0	0.9	1.2	1.2	1.7	1.9	2.6	3.5
Survival rate (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	CR	3.9^a)	5.0^a)	4.9^a)	6.4^a)	6.3^a)	8.3^a)	8.8^a)	9.2^a)	8.6^a)	9.8^a)	11.4^a)
	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	Std	4.0^a)	5.0^a)	4.9^a)	6.5^a)	6.5^a)	8.5^a)	9.3^a)	9.9^a)	9.8^a)	11.2^a)	12.9^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)	CR	2.9	3.0	2.9	3.8	3.8	4.6	5.0	5.7	5.6	6.8	8.4
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)	Std	2.8	2.9	2.9	3.8	3.9	4.7	5.2	6.0	6.1	7.5	9.2
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	CR	1.3	1.7	2.3	3.6	3.1	3.8	3.4	3.9	4.2	6.8	7.4
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	Std	1.3	1.6	2.4	3.6	2.9	3.7	3.5	4.1	4.6	8.6	8.5
	Urban rural consolidated cities	CR	1.0	1.1	1.4	1.6	1.6	1.8	2.2	2.1	2.2	4.3	5.5
	Urban rural consolidated cities	Std	1.0	1.1	1.4	1.7	1.6	2.0	2.4	2.3	2.4	5.1	6.6
	Counties	CR	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.7^c)	0.7^c)	1.4^c)	1.3^c)	1.3^c)	1.3^c)	3.0^c)	3.9^c)
	Counties	Std	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.8^c)	0.8^c)	1.6^c)	1.4^c)	1.6^c)	1.5^c)	3.7^c)	4.6^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		3.6	4.4	4.4	5.7	5.6	6.9	7.5	7.9	7.3	6.8	7.5
Neurological recovery rate (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	CR	0.8^a)	1.6^a)	1.5^a)	1.7^a)	1.6^a)	2.9^a)	3.3^a)	3.9^a)	4.9^a)	5.8^a)	6.0^a)
	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	Std	0.9^a)	1.6^a)	1.6^a)	1.7^a)	1.6^a)	3.0^a)	3.5^a)	4.4^a)	5.9^a)	6.8^a)	7.1^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city	CR	0.7	0.8	0.8	1.1	1.1	1.8	2.2	2.8	3.2	4.0	4.9
	Local districts of Metropolitan city	Std	0.7	0.8	0.8	1.1	1.1	1.9	2.4	3.0	3.4	4.5	5.5
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	CR	0.7	0.6	1.2	1.1	1.1	1.3	1.2	1.8	1.8	3.3	3.2
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	Std	0.8	0.5	1.3	1.1	1.0	1.2	1.2	1.9	2.1	4.6	4.0
	Urban rural consolidated cities	CR	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.6	0.7	1.0	1.1	1.3	2.2	2.7
	Urban rural consolidated cities	Std	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.7	0.6	0.8	1.2	1.3	1.5	2.6	3.5
	Counties	CR	0.1^c)	0.1^c)	0.2^c)	0.3^c)	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.8^c)	0.8^c)	1.9^c)	2.1^c)
	Counties	Std	0.1^c)	0.1^c)	0.2^c)	0.4^c)	0.4^c)	0.7^c)	0.6^c)	1.0^c)	1.1^c)	2.5^c)	2.6^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		0.7	1.5	1.3	1.4	1.3	2.3	2.8	3.1	4.1	3.9	3.9

CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; -, null value; CR, crude rate; Std, standardized rate.

^a)Region with the highest values in the year.

^b)Local districts of Metropolitan cities, cites with more than 300,000 population, or local districts of cities with more than 500,000 population or ‘Gu’ of ‘Si’ with more than 500,000 population.

^c)Region with the lowest values in the year.

REFERENCES

1. Ro YS, Shin SD, Song KJ, et al. Public awareness and self-efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in communities and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-level analysis. Resuscitation 2016;102:17-24.
Article
PubMed
2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008-2016 Community health statistics at a glance. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017.

Figure & Table

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Long-term outcomes of successful cardiac resuscitation
Han Uk Ryu, Sang Woo Yeom, Byoung-Soo Shin, Jong Seung Kim, Hyun Goo Kang
Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association of Evening Shifts, Night Shifts, and Consistent Overtime Exceeding 10 Hours per Day with Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Case–Control Study
Seung Won Ha, Seung Mok Ryoo, Sang-Min Kim, June-Sung Kim, Hyojeong Kwon, Hanna Park, Dongju Kim, Won Young Kim
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(18): 5393. CrossRef
Impact of emergency medical service with advanced life support training for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Republic of Korea: A retrospective multicenter study
Jae Yun Ahn, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Haewon Jung, Young Sun Ro, Jeong Ho Park, Takeru Abe
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(6): e0286047. CrossRef
Influence of the Level of Emergency Medical Facility on the Short-Term Treatment Results of Cardiac Arrest: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Interhospital Transfer
Je Young Chung, Yuri Choi, Jinwoo Jeong, Sung Woo Lee, Kap Su Han, Su Jin Kim, Won Young Kim, Hyunggoo Kang, Eun Seog Hong, Chak W. Kam
Emergency Medicine International.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
National Surveillance of Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Korea: The 10-Year Trend From 2009 to 2018
Minha Kim, Jaeyong Yu, Hansol Chang, Sejin Heo, Se Uk Lee, Sung Yeon Hwang, Hee Yoon, Won Chul Cha, Tae Gun Shin, Taerim Kim
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between Survival and Time of On-Scene Resuscitation in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study
Hang Park, Ki Ahn, Eui Lee, Ju Park
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(2): 496. CrossRef
Association between Cardiac Arrest Time and Favorable Neurological Outcomes in Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with Targeted Temperature Management
Zoon Ho Lee, Yong Hwan Kim, Jun Ho Lee, Dong Woo Lee, Kyoung Yul Lee, Seong Youn Hwang
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
A simple method for removing initial irregularity of an electrocardiogram during a transient state of a power supply in a defibrillator
Jeong-Han Yi, Ki-Han Kim, Jin-Su Ahn, Hyung-Sik Kim
Technology and Health Care.2020; 28(1_suppl): 327. CrossRef

Cite this article

Cite this article

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019;6(2):183-188. Published online June 28, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.18.074

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
bib — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019;6(2):183-188. Published online June 28, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.18.074

Figure

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Index	Value	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
Rate of CPR performed by layperson (%)	Total	-	-	1.9	2.7	3.4	5.0	6.9	9.1	12.9	14.1	16.8
	Seoul	-	-	3.1	5.5	7.3	12.3	17.4	19.8	26.2	23.6	29.6
	Busan	-	-	1.6	1.7	1.6	4.6	4.8	7.0	9.9	11.2	13.3
	Daegu	-	-	1.6	3.0	4.1	5.5	6.1	9.6	12.9	18.3	23.6
	Incheon	-	-	2.4	4.9	5.3	6.2	6.9	8.0	14.6	13.0	16.6
	Gwangju	-	-	0.9	1.4	1.5	2.8	3.8	4.4	10.1	8.2	8.1
	Daejeon	-	-	1.5	1.7	2.3	3.9	4.6	9.1	16.2	14.4	20.8
	Ulsan	-	-	1.6	1.3	1.6	4.9	4.7	7.3	8.1	14.9	20.7
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	3.8	2.6	2.6	7.1	13.4
	Gyeonggi	-	-	2.2	2.7	4.0	5.1	6.8	8.5	12.6	16.3	18.9
	Gangwon	-	-	2.1	2.8	3.7	3.4	4.1	8.4	11.7	15.2	16.2
	Chungbuk	-	-	0.9	1.1	1.7	2.4	3.9	5.9	7.0	9.0	13.9
	Chungnam	-	-	1.5	1.2	2.8	3.3	4.4	6.6	9.3	8.4	12.1
	Jeonbuk	-	-	2.2	2.1	2.4	3.6	4.2	8.0	11.4	11.3	9.7
	Jeonnam	-	-	1.5	1.3	1.2	1.1	3.2	4.2	6.4	6.3	6.1
	Gyeongbuk	-	-	0.9	1.0	1.0	1.4	2.8	4.2	4.6	8.1	8.0
	Gyeongnam	-	-	0.6	1.8	1.3	3.2	4.7	6.2	8.2	9.7	11.5
	Jeju	-	-	1.4	2.5	1.9	3.5	5.4	8.5	11.7	17.9	17.0
	Disparity (max-min)	-	-	2.5	4.5	6.3	11.2	14.6	17.2	23.6	17.3	23.5
Rate of ROSC before hospital arrival (%)	Total	0.9	1.1	1.2	1.9	1.8	3.1	3.5	3.7	4.2	5.1	6.9
	Seoul	1.2	1.3	1.5	2.6	2.0	2.8	4.1	4.5	5.0	6.2	7.7
	Busan	0.9	0.8	1.7	2.3	2.0	3.0	4.6	5.1	5.6	6.7	10.2
	Daegu	1.3	0.4	0.6	1.6	2.2	3.6	3.3	4.7	4.3	5.6	9.0
	Incheon	0.3	1.1	1.9	1.8	2.0	3.8	3.3	3.8	5.0	5.5	7.5
	Gwangju	0.2	0.8	2.0	1.6	2.4	5.2	3.8	4.2	5.6	4.5	9.4
	Daejeon	0.4	1.1	1.4	1.2	3.0	3.9	3.1	5.6	4.8	4.3	7.3
	Ulsan	0.3	1.6	0.8	2.5	3.4	4.0	4.9	4.3	6.4	4.7	9.3
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	3.5	3.8	6.2	7.5	15.3
	Gyeonggi	1.3	1.4	1.3	1.9	1.8	3.0	3.9	3.4	4.6	5.8	8.4
	Gangwon	1.8	0.5	1.0	1.8	2.3	2.4	2.4	2.3	4.2	4.0	5.1
	Chungbuk	1.3	1.1	0.6	2.1	1.0	3.3	2.1	3.4	3.0	3.0	4.7
	Chungnam	0.8	1.4	0.4	1.5	1.0	4.4	3.0	2.5	2.3	2.6	5.8
	Jeonbuk	0.6	0.6	0.5	1.5	1.6	4.1	3.7	4.7	4.4	4.7	4.1
	Jeonnam	0.7	1.6	1.0	1.6	1.8	2.5	2.7	2.3	2.4	4.1	3.0
	Gyeongbuk	0.9	1.0	1.1	1.5	0.9	1.7	2.4	2.7	2.2	3.6	4.4
	Gyeongnam	0.4	0.4	0.8	1.8	1.4	2.5	2.5	2.9	3.2	4.6	5.1
	Jeju	0.7	1.2	1.2	2.6	1.6	4.9	5.5	3.9	3.3	5.1	5.1
	Disparity (max-min)	1.6	1.2	1.6	1.4	2.5	3.5	3.4	3.3	4.2	4.9	12.3
Survival rate (%)	Total	2.3	2.6	2.5	3.3	3.3	4.1	4.4	4.8	4.8	6.3	7.6
	Seoul	3.9	5.0	4.9	6.4	6.3	8.3	8.8	9.2	8.6	9.8	11.4
	Busan	0.6	2.0	2.0	3.5	3.6	4.5	4.4	5.3	5.7	7.6	9.1
	Daegu	2.2	1.3	1.7	2.4	2.4	3.7	4.7	6.1	5.4	5.1	7.0
	Incheon	4.3	3.9	4.5	4.1	4.0	5.8	5.3	6.7	5.8	7.2	8.2
	Gwangju	3.2	2.0	3.1	4.6	4.0	4.1	2.9	4.6	3.9	7.6	9.2
	Daejeon	4.4	3.9	4.2	4.2	8.1	6.6	6.8	7.9	7.3	7.1	8.4
	Ulsan	1.4	1.9	0.5	2.7	4.4	3.3	3.8	3.0	4.5	6.4	10.9
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	5.3	2.6	3.7	2.2	11.9
	Gyeonggi	3.0	3.4	2.8	3.7	3.3	4.0	4.8	4.8	5.7	6.8	8.2
	Gangwon	3.2	2.4	1.9	2.9	4.1	3.1	3.6	3.8	4.5	4.7	6.1
	Chungbuk	1.7	1.2	1.4	2.0	1.5	3.0	2.5	3.8	2.8	3.9	5.3
	Chungnam	0.3	0.7	0.7	1.2	0.7	2.5	2.6	1.9	1.9	3.5	6.1
	Jeonbuk	1.1	2.4	1.2	1.5	2.1	3.0	2.9	4.4	3.2	4.8	5.1
	Jeonnam	0.9	1.4	1.4	1.4	1.2	1.7	1.6	1.2	1.1	4.4	4.7
	Gyeongbuk	0.7	0.6	1.1	1.3	1.1	1.6	1.4	1.8	1.3	3.4	4.3
	Gyeongnam	0.2	0.5	1.9	1.8	1.1	1.6	2.1	2.3	2.6	4.5	5.5
	Jeju	1.4	2.7	1.8	3.2	2.8	3.5	4.6	3.6	3.6	7.4	6.2
	Disparity (max-min)	4.2	4.5	4.4	5.2	7.4	6.7	7.4	8.0	7.5	7.6	7.6
Neurological recovery rate (%)	Total	0.6	0.7	0.8	1.0	0.9	1.6	1.8	2.3	2.7	3.6	4.2
	Seoul	0.8	1.6	1.5	1.7	1.6	2.9	3.3	3.9	4.9	5.8	6.0
	Busan	0.0	0.4	0.3	1.2	0.8	1.9	2.2	3.0	3.1	4.6	5.3
	Daegu	1.1	0.0	0.9	1.1	1.2	2.2	2.3	3.9	3.7	3.7	5.4
	Incheon	1.0	1.1	0.8	1.3	1.4	2.1	2.2	3.0	3.8	3.8	4.5
	Gwangju	0.2	0.6	0.9	1.1	0.6	2.1	1.6	2.2	2.2	3.7	4.8
	Daejeon	1.6	1.5	1.4	0.3	1.4	2.9	1.9	3.8	3.3	3.9	4.0
	Ulsan	0.6	1.1	0.3	1.0	2.1	0.9	2.3	1.5	2.6	4.0	6.2
	Sejong	-	-	-	-	-	-	1.8	2.6	3.7	0.0	9.3
	Gyeonggi	0.8	0.8	0.9	0.9	1.0	1.3	2.1	2.4	2.8	3.8	4.6
	Gangwon	1.4	0.9	0.6	1.7	1.4	1.1	1.0	2.1	2.5	2.5	2.5
	Chungbuk	0.4	0.3	0.3	1.0	0.6	1.0	0.7	1.4	1.8	2.5	3.1
	Chungnam	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.1	1.1	1.2	0.8	0.9	1.9	2.9
	Jeonbuk	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.4	0.4	1.4	1.2	2.0	2.2	2.7	3.3
	Jeonnam	0.2	0.1	0.7	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.5	0.6	0.4	2.3	2.0
	Gyeongbuk	0.2	0.1	0.3	0.6	0.5	0.6	0.9	0.9	0.8	2.3	2.7
	Gyeongnam	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.5	0.4	0.7	1.1	1.5	1.8	2.7	3.1
	Jeju	0.5	1.4	0.9	1.7	1.2	2.8	2.7	2.0	2.2	4.6	3.7
	Disparity (max-min)	1.6	1.6	1.5	1.5	2.0	2.5	2.8	3.3	4.5	5.8	7.3

Index	City type		2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
Rate of CPR performed by layperson (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city		-	-	3.1^a)	5.5^a)	7.3^a)	12.3^a)	17.4^a)	19.8^a)	26.2^a)	23.6^a)	29.6^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)		-	-	1.9	2.8	3.5	5.0	6.4	8.8	12.8	15.2	17.7
	Cities with less than 300,000 people		-	-	1.7	1.1^c)	1.7	2.3	4.3	5.5	10.4	11.4	15.9
	Urban rural consolidated cities		-	-	1.3	1.5	2.0	2.7	3.4	5.4	7.3	9.0	10.2
	Counties		-	-	1.1^c)	1.2	1.4^c)	1.8^c)	2.8^c)	4.4^c)	6.4^c)	7.7^c)	9.5^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		-	-	2.0	4.4	5.9	10.5	14.6	15.4	19.8	15.9	20.1
ROSC before hospital arrival (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city		1.2^a)	1.3	1.5^a)	2.6^a)	2.0	2.8	4.1^a)	4.5^a)	5.0^a)	6.2^a)	7.7
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)		0.9	1.0	1.3	1.9	1.9	3.4^a)	3.6	4.1	4.5	5.5	8.2^a)
	Cities with less than 300,000 people		0.9	1.5^a)	0.9^c)	1.8	2.1^a)	2.2^c)	3.7	3.0	4.2	5.6	6.1
	Urban rural consolidated cities		0.9	1.0^c)	1.0	1.7	1.6	2.9	2.9^c)	2.9	3.4	3.9	4.9
	Counties		0.7^c)	1.0^c)	0.9^c)	1.6^c)	1.2^c)	3.0	3.0	2.8^c)	3.1^c)	3.6^c)	4.7^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		0.5	0.5	0.6	1.0	0.9	1.2	1.2	1.7	1.9	2.6	3.5
Survival rate (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	CR	3.9^a)	5.0^a)	4.9^a)	6.4^a)	6.3^a)	8.3^a)	8.8^a)	9.2^a)	8.6^a)	9.8^a)	11.4^a)
	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	Std	4.0^a)	5.0^a)	4.9^a)	6.5^a)	6.5^a)	8.5^a)	9.3^a)	9.9^a)	9.8^a)	11.2^a)	12.9^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)	CR	2.9	3.0	2.9	3.8	3.8	4.6	5.0	5.7	5.6	6.8	8.4
	Local districts of Metropolitan city^b)	Std	2.8	2.9	2.9	3.8	3.9	4.7	5.2	6.0	6.1	7.5	9.2
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	CR	1.3	1.7	2.3	3.6	3.1	3.8	3.4	3.9	4.2	6.8	7.4
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	Std	1.3	1.6	2.4	3.6	2.9	3.7	3.5	4.1	4.6	8.6	8.5
	Urban rural consolidated cities	CR	1.0	1.1	1.4	1.6	1.6	1.8	2.2	2.1	2.2	4.3	5.5
	Urban rural consolidated cities	Std	1.0	1.1	1.4	1.7	1.6	2.0	2.4	2.3	2.4	5.1	6.6
	Counties	CR	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.7^c)	0.7^c)	1.4^c)	1.3^c)	1.3^c)	1.3^c)	3.0^c)	3.9^c)
	Counties	Std	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.8^c)	0.8^c)	1.6^c)	1.4^c)	1.6^c)	1.5^c)	3.7^c)	4.6^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		3.6	4.4	4.4	5.7	5.6	6.9	7.5	7.9	7.3	6.8	7.5
Neurological recovery rate (%)	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	CR	0.8^a)	1.6^a)	1.5^a)	1.7^a)	1.6^a)	2.9^a)	3.3^a)	3.9^a)	4.9^a)	5.8^a)	6.0^a)
	Local districts of Seoul metropolitan city	Std	0.9^a)	1.6^a)	1.6^a)	1.7^a)	1.6^a)	3.0^a)	3.5^a)	4.4^a)	5.9^a)	6.8^a)	7.1^a)
	Local districts of Metropolitan city	CR	0.7	0.8	0.8	1.1	1.1	1.8	2.2	2.8	3.2	4.0	4.9
	Local districts of Metropolitan city	Std	0.7	0.8	0.8	1.1	1.1	1.9	2.4	3.0	3.4	4.5	5.5
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	CR	0.7	0.6	1.2	1.1	1.1	1.3	1.2	1.8	1.8	3.3	3.2
	Cities with less than 300,000 people	Std	0.8	0.5	1.3	1.1	1.0	1.2	1.2	1.9	2.1	4.6	4.0
	Urban rural consolidated cities	CR	0.3	0.3	0.4	0.6	0.6	0.7	1.0	1.1	1.3	2.2	2.7
	Urban rural consolidated cities	Std	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.7	0.6	0.8	1.2	1.3	1.5	2.6	3.5
	Counties	CR	0.1^c)	0.1^c)	0.2^c)	0.3^c)	0.3^c)	0.6^c)	0.5^c)	0.8^c)	0.8^c)	1.9^c)	2.1^c)
	Counties	Std	0.1^c)	0.1^c)	0.2^c)	0.4^c)	0.4^c)	0.7^c)	0.6^c)	1.0^c)	1.1^c)	2.5^c)	2.6^c)
	Disparity (max-min)		0.7	1.5	1.3	1.4	1.3	2.3	2.8	3.1	4.1	3.9	3.9

Table 1. Disparities in Sudden cardiac arrest survey main indices, 2006-2016

Unit: %, %p.

CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; -, null value.

Table 2. Results of sudden cardiac arrest main indices and their disparities among city types, 2006-2016

CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; -, null value; CR, crude rate; Std, standardized rate.

Region with the highest values in the year.

Local districts of Metropolitan cities, cites with more than 300,000 population, or local districts of cities with more than 500,000 population or ‘Gu’ of ‘Si’ with more than 500,000 population.

Region with the lowest values in the year.

Articles

Page Path

Main outcomes of the sudden cardiac arrest survey 2006 to 2016

Full Article

STRUCTURE OF THE SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST SURVEY

INCIDENCE OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST AND SURVIVAL STATUS

STATUS OF SUDDEN CARDIAC ARRESTS IN EACH REGION

NOTES

REFERENCES

Figure & Table

References

Citations

Cite this article

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Figure

Related topics

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Table 1.

Table 2.

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

FOR CONTRIBUTORS