Department of Medicine Surgery and Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
Correspondence to: Danilo Biondino Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via Salvador Allende, Baronissi 84081, Italy Email: danilojbiondino@libero.it
Received: February 15, 2023 Revised: March 13, 2023 Accepted: March 20, 2023
We recently reviewed an article by Torabi et al. [1] in your journal concerning evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) by ultrasound after moderate traumatic brain injury [1]. The article is noteworthy for its intriguing idea, but we would like to raise several concerns.
In the study, the authors utilized a 7.5 MHz linear probe to perform ONSD measurements in axial and coronal sections, most likely using the ultrasound B-scan technique. The B scan is very sensitive in detecting small optic nerve calcifications as in cases of optic nerve drusen, but it is not very reliable for measurements. [2–6].
We are aware that measurement of ONSD by ultrasound B scan has largely been conducted as a noninvasive method to detect increased intracranial pressure, but the presence of artefacts hinders these measurements [7–10]. Moreover, measuring the ONSD in the primary position is essential because altering the eye position can affect the quantity of cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the optic nerve, resulting in inaccurate ONSD measurements.
The study mentions that the authors performed the examination with closed eye lids, making it challenging to determine the gaze direction and potentially decreasing the image quality due to sound attenuation from the lids, creating less reliable results [11–13]. For this reason, it is advised to perform the examination with open eye lids and in the primary position after administering anesthetic eye drops, using methylcellulose as a coupling agent between the probe and the eye [14–17].
Therefore, in order to eliminate these anomalies and allow more accurate outcomes, it is recommended that standardized A scan techniques be utilized in future studies [18–20].
NOTES
ETHICS STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
FUNDING
None.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: all authors; Writing–original draft: all authors; Writing–review & editing: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Torabi M, Mirhosseini A, Mirzaee M. The role of repeated brain computed tomography based on ultrasound monitoring of optic nerve sheath diameter after moderate traumatic brain injury. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2023; 10:68-73.
2. Rosa N, De Bernardo M, Abbinante G, Vecchio G, Cione F, Capasso L. Optic nerve drusen evaluation: a comparison between ultrasound and OCT. J Clin Med 2022; 11:3715.
3. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Optic nerve evaluation in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:E36.
4. Cornetta P, Marotta G, De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Ultrasound and optic neuritis. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1598.
5. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery. J Robot Surg 2019; 13:709-10.
6. Paola ID, Graziano M, Cornetta P. Effect of percutaneous tracheostomy on optic nerve sheath diameter (TONS trial). Indian J Crit Care Med 2022; 26:653.
7. De Bernardo M, Rosa N. Transbulbar B-mode sonography in multiple sclerosis: clinical and biological relevance. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44:508.
8. De Bernardo M, Marotta G, Rosa N. Sonography of the optic nerve sheath diameter. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:1845.
9. Graziano M, Di Paola I, Marotta G, Cornetta P, Capasso L. Letter to Editor: The Cushing reflex and the vasopressin-mediated hemodynamic response to increased intracranial pressure during acute elevations in intraabdominal pressure. Surgery 2022; 172:777.
10. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasound measurement in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 139:399-400.
11. De Bernardo M, Rosa N. Comment on “Optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound evaluation in intensive care unit: possible role and clinical aspects in neurological critical patients’ daily monitoring”. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018:6154357.
12. Rosa N, De Bernardo M. Measurement of the optic nerve in a resource-limited setting. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2017; 8:310-1.
13. De Bernardo M, Rosa N. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur J Neurol 2018; 25:e24.
14. De Bernardo M, Rosa N. Transorbital sonography to evaluate optic nerve in hypertensive encephalopathy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27:1124.
15. Biondino D, Costigliola R, Mottola F, Graziano M, Yılmaz F. Comment on: optic nerve sheath diameter measurement by ultrasound and age group. Ann Saudi Med 2023; 43:196-7.
16. De Bernardo M, Rosa N. Measuring optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for intracranial pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018; 136:1309-10.
17. Rosa D, Graziano M, De Paola I. Evaluation of intracranial pressure during neural laser discectomy. Pain Physician 2022; 25:E414.
18. Vitiello L, De Bernardo M, Capasso L, Cornetta P, Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasound evaluation in animals and normal subjects. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:797018.
19. De Bernardo M, Vitiello L, De Pascale I, Capasso L, Cornetta P, Rosa N. Optic nerve ultrasound evaluation in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:845554.
20. Rosa N, De Bernardo M, Di Stasi M, Cione F, Capaldo I. A-scan ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison of optic nerves. J Clin Med 2022; 11:6153.