| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Search
Clin Exp Emerg Med Search

CLOSE

Clin Exp Emerg Med > Accepted Articles
doi: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.25.075    [Accepted]
Comparison of Four Non-invasive Tools for Predicting Sepsis and Septic Shock Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study
Matteo Guarino1,2 , Giacomo Maroncelli1, Benedetta Perna1, Paolo Baldin1, Caterina Ghirardi1,2, Alex Zanotto1, Silvia Eichner1, Matteo Bolognesi1, Chiara Pesci2, Martina Maritati3, Carlo Contini3, Roberto De Giorgio1 , Michele Domenico Spampinato1,2
1Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Italy
2Emergency Department, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
3Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Correspondence  Roberto De Giorgio Email: dgrrrt@unife.it
Received: April 9, 2025. Revised: August 7, 2025.  Accepted: August 9, 2025. Published online: December 2, 2025.
ABSTRACT
Objective
Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction, remains a major global health concern. Early detection remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. Non-invasive tools such as the Shock Index (SI), Diastolic Shock Index (DSI), Capillary Refill Time (CRT), and Mottling Score (MS) may help assess hemodynamic status and predict mortality, but a comprehensive comparison of their prognostic value is lacking. This study compares the performance of these tools in predicting mortality at 24 hours, 7 days, and 28 days in septic patients.
Methods
A monocentric, prospective observational study was conducted from January to September 2024. Adult patients (≥18 years) with suspected infection and a National Early Warning Score-2 ≥5 were enrolled. Demographic data, vital signs, CRT, MS, and mortality outcomes were recorded at 24 hours, 7 days, and 28 days.
Results
A total of 135 patients were included (median age 85 years, IQR 79–90; 44.4% female). Mortality rates were 15.6% at 24 hours, 25.2% at 7 days, and 35.6% at 28 days. CRT showed the highest predictive value for 24-hour mortality (AUC: 0.829, p<0.01), while MS had the best performance at 7 days (AUC: 0.732, p<0.01) and 28 days (AUC: 0.749, p<0.01). No significant differences emerged in pairwise comparisons.
Conclusion
While no tool was found to significantly outperform others, CRT and MS provide valuable, non-invasive mortality prediction in sepsis. Indeed, CRT is most effective for early risk stratification, while MS correlates with mid- and long-term outcomes, supporting their integration into clinical assessment.
Keywords: Capillary Refill Time, Diastolic shock index, Mottling Score, Sepsis, Septic Shock
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
371
View
49
Download
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
101-3104, Brownstone Seoul, 464 Cheongpa-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Korea
TEL: +82-31-709-0918   E-mail: office@ceemjournal.org
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © by The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI