Abstract
Recently, the number of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases has increased remarkably in South Korea, so the triage clinics and emergency departments (ED) are expected to be overcrowded with patients with presumed infection. As of March 21st, there was a total of 8,799 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 102 related deaths in South Korea that was one of the top countries with high incidence rates [
1]. This sharp increase in infection is associated with 1) outbreaks in individual provinces, 2) deployment of rapid and aggressive screening tests, 3) dedicated healthcare staffs for virus screening tests, 4) quarantine inspection data transparency and accurate data reporting, and 5) public health lessons from previous Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreaks. This commentary introduces innovative screening tests that are currently used in South Korea for COVID-19, e.g., Drive-Through and Walk-Through tests, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of both methods.
-
Keywords: Infectious Disease Outbreak; Virus Diseases; Early Detection of Disease; COVID-19 diagnostic testing
Drive-Through (DT) and Walk-Through (WT) tests are designed to provide a rapid screening, have a minimal risk of infection, and reduce excessive use of medical supplies like personal protective equipment (PPE) [
2]. The risk of infection may be reduced by limiting the exposure of testees or direct contacts between the testees and healthcare workers. The DT tests are generally conducted in large low-traffic areas, such as public parking or stadium parking lots [
2,
3]. On the other hand, the WT tests can be performed in a clean testing booth that can be installed near the hospital.
Table 1 shows the pros and cons of DT and WT testing for COVID-19.
DRIVE-THROUGH (DT) TESTING FOR COVID-19
Testing for COVID-19 can be performed at a drive-through site, as shown in
Figure 1. The driver/ testee can stay inside his car during the entire process (<15 min), consisting of multiple steps: patient registration (3-4 min), medical examination (2 min), specimen collection (2 min), discharge instructions (2 min), and payment for testing service (2 min). Healthcare workers are supposed to wear the level-D PPE that is composed of inner and outer gloves, a gown (hooded coverall), an N95 mask (respirator), goggles (eye shield) or a face shield, and safety shoes or boots. Depending on the required contact level with patients or the availability of medical supply resources, healthcare staff may use PPE after modifying it, following the facility guidelines [
4].
WALK-THROUGH (WT) TESTING FOR COVID-19
Testing for COVID-19 can be performed at a walking-through site, as shown in
Figure 2.
Negative pressure booth
In the WT test using a negative pressure booth, the testee stays inside the disinfected booth, while the healthcare worker is outside the booth, disallowing a direct contact between the two. The clean booth is designed to enclose the testee with transparent walls and a pair of gloves on one wall for healthcare staff to use when collecting patient samples and examining the patient. Before the test, healthcare staff is required to put on the PPE consisting of a pair of gloves, a gown, and a disposable face mask. The PPE can be adjusted to follow the facility guidelines or according to the availability of medical supply resources. The whole testing process, from registration to payment, can be completed in about 20 minutes.
Positive pressure booth
The WT test using a positive pressure booth combines the advantages of the DT test and the WT test using a negative pressure booth. The tester stays inside the booth while the testee stays outside; thus, direct contact between the two is avoided (
Fig. 3). The positive pressure booth looks similar to the negative pressure booth. Positive pressure inside the booth is used to prevent contaminants from coming inside the booth. The testing process is similar but shorter (<10 min) since it is unnecessary to disinfect the booth after each test.
Pandemics caused by viruses have tended to break out once every decade or every other decade over the past 300 years [
5]. Now, they may be occurring more often and in more variable cycles. Successful management of viral infection and diseases requires quarantine and treatment of those who may have an infection. Thus, early-stage screening tests that are efficient and effective are essential for preventing the virus from spreading widely. Each step of the testing process should be completed quickly and minimize the existing risk of infection for healthcare workers and testees alike, meeting the general safety requirements.
In this commentary, we introduce innovative screening testing that has been successfully applied to the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. Although the efficacy of the methods should be further clarified, we believe that our experience with a successful implementation of these tests for COVID-19 may apply to other countries.
Fig. 1.
The Drive-through (DT) testing site.
1) Registration: Healthcare staff assists the check-in process.K
2) Medical exam: Healthcare staff records testee’s symptoms, personal information, and epidemiologic association. The staff completes this process using a mobile phone without making contact with the testee. If the testee is suspected of coronavirus infection, his/her samples are collected before he/she gets transferred to a designated hospital.
3) Collection of specimens: Healthcare staff leans over the open window for naso- and oro-pharyngeal swabs, and then the testee closes his/her car windows to collect his/her sputum specimen. Car ventilation is set at the “recirculation” mode to minimize the risk of infection for healthcare workers. After receiving the samples, the healthcare staff puts on a new vinyl apron and disinfects his/her hands using alcohol-based hand sanitizer.
4) Discharge instructions: The testee gets the information about how to check the test result and is asked to self-quarantine until further notice regarding the outcome. Instructions are also provided regarding what the testee should do if his/her symptoms get worse.
Fig. 2.
The Walk-through (WT) test using the negative pressure booth. (Top) Flow diagram of the testing, and (Bottom) a picture of four “safe assessment and fast evaluation technical booths.”
1 & 2) Patient registration and waiting in the reception area: A one-stop kiosk assists the check-in process, reducing the risk of infection for both the healthcare staff and the testee.
3) Patient exam: Healthcare staff records testee’s symptoms, personal information, and epidemiologic association. The staff can complete this process using a mobile phone or a Personal Computer (PC) system.
4) Collection of specimens and discharge instructions: The testee enters the clean booth once the check-in process is complete. The testee stays inside the negative pressure booth, while the healthcare staff is outside the booth the whole time. The booth was designed with transparent walls, one of which has a pair of long gloves for a healthcare worker to use to make naso- and oro-pharyngeal swabs. The testee collects the sputum sample by himself/herself in the closed booth. The testee then receives information about how to check the test result and how to self-quarantine. Instructions are also provided regarding what the testee should do if his/her symptoms get worse. After the exit of the testee, the booth gets ventilated and disinfected for 2 minutes the first time and 10 minutes after that.
Fig. 3.
The Walk-through (WT) test using the positive pressure booth [7].
1) Medical exam: Healthcare staff records testee’s symptoms, personal information, and epidemiologic association. The booth is installed in a tent or a container house separated from the hospital. The staff can complete this process using a mobile phone without making contact with the testees. If the testee is suspected of coronavirus infection, his/her samples are collected before he/she gets transferred to a designated hospital.
2) Collection of specimens: The tester enters into the positive pressure booth and stays inside, while the testee is outside. The booth is designed with transparent walls, one of which has a pair of long gloves for a healthcare worker to use to make naso- and oro-pharyngeal swabs. The testee collects the sputum sample by himself/herself outside the booth.
3) Discharge instructions: The testee receives the information about how to check the testing result and is asked to self-quarantine until further notice regarding the outcome. Instructions are also provided regarding what the testee should do if his/her symptoms get worse.
Table 1.Pros and cons of Drive-through (DT) and Walk-through (WT) test for COVID-19
Table 1.
|
DT testing |
WT testing
|
|
Negative pressure booth type |
Positive pressure booth type |
|
Pros |
• Efficiency |
• Efficiency |
• Efficiency |
|
|
- Testing can be completed within 15 min. |
|
- Testing can be completed in about 20 min. |
|
- Testing can be completed in about 15 min. |
|
• Privacy protection |
• Reduced risk of infection |
• Reduced risk of infection |
|
|
- The testee remains in his/her car during the entire process. |
|
- Disinfection and ventilation of the booth should be done after every use, and it can be done with relative ease. |
|
- No need for disinfection and ventilation of the booth |
|
• Reduced risk of infection |
|
- Healthcare staffs don’t make any direct contact with the testees. |
|
- Healthcare staffs don’t make any direct contact with the testees. |
|
|
- Tests are conducted outdoors. |
• Prevent excessive use of medical supplies |
• Prevent excessive use of medical supplies |
|
|
- The car provides isolation to the testee. |
|
- The booth walls separate healthcare staff from testees, so the use of medical supplies is reduced. |
|
- The booth walls separate healthcare staff from testees, so the use of medical supplies is reduced. |
|
• No additional equipment |
• Reduced workload |
• Reduced workload |
|
|
- There is no need for an extra isolation room or negative pressure room. |
|
- The workload for conducting the WT tests is less than the DT tests. |
|
- The workload for conducting the WT tests is less than the DT test. |
|
|
|
• Robustness of method |
• Test more patients |
|
|
|
|
- The booth is installed close or next to the hospital unit, so testing is less likely to be affected by adverse weather conditions. |
|
- Testing service is accessible even to non-drivers. |
|
|
|
• Test more patients |
|
- It is possible to test multiple patients at once using more than one clean booth. |
|
|
|
|
- Testing service is accessible even to non-drivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
- It is possible to test multiple patients at once using more than one clean booth. |
|
|
Cons |
• Medical consumerism |
• Medical consumerism |
• Medical consumerism |
|
|
- A patient may get tested at multiple testing sites, which can be seen as promoting medical consumerism. |
|
- A patient may get tested at multiple testing sites, which can be seen as promoting medical consumerism. |
|
- A patient may get tested at multiple testing sites, which can be seen as promoting medical consumerism. |
|
• Additionally required supports |
• Risk of infection |
• Risk of infection |
|
|
- Healthcare staffs will benefit from a support person who helps with writing orders and filling out medical records. |
|
- The risk of infection exists for the testees while he/she is waiting for the test in a reception area, especially if overcrowded. |
|
- The risk of infection exists for healthcare staff for any equipment failure, such as when the gloves tear. |
|
|
- The testing site should be in the areas that are less populated but close enough to the hospital for future follow-up. |
|
- The risk of infection exists for healthcare staff for any kind of equipment failures, such as glove tears or perforation. |
• Adverse weather conditions |
|
• Worker fatigue |
|
|
- Adverse weather conditions may complicate outdoors testing. |
|
|
- Healthcare staff fatigue due to excessive workload. Working outdoors >2 hours wearing the high-level PPE can tire the staff to the level of fatigue, so taking frequent breaks is recommended. [6] |
|
|
|
• Risk of infection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The risk of infection exists related to possible handling errors of samples. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Healthcare staff may lose attention when changing gowns or gloves due to fatigue. |
|
|
|
|
|
• Testing capacity limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Non-drivers cannot use the testing service. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cross-infection may occur between the driver and the passenger, so only one person/driver at a time should be tested per vehicle. |
|
|
|
|
|
• Adverse weather conditions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Adverse weather conditions may complicate outdoors testing. |
|
|
|
|
|
• Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The initial cost of the installation of a test site can be relatively high. |
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES
- 1. Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current statistics of COVID-19 in Korea. http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/bdBoardList_Real.do?brdId=1&brdGubun=13&ncvContSeq=&contS eq=&board_id=&gubun=. Updated 2020. Accessed March 21, 2020
- 2. Weiss EA, Ngo J, Gilbert GH, Quinn JV. Drive-through medicine: a novel proposal for rapid evaluation of patients during an influenza pandemic. Ann Emerg Med 2010;55:268-73.
- 3. Kwon KT, Ko JH, Shin H, Sung M, Kim JY. Drive-Through Screening Center for COVID-19: a Safe and Efficient Screening System against Massive Community Outbreak. measures. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e123.
- 4. World Health Organization. Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Interim guiance 27 February 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331215/WHO-2019-nCov-IPCPPE_use2020.1-eng.pdf. Updated 2020. Accessed March 21, 2020
- 5. Gust ID, Hampson AW, Lavanchy D. Planning for the next pandemic of influenza. Rev Med Virol 2001;11:59-70.
- 6. Radonovich LJ Jr, Cheng J, Shenal BV, Hodgson M, Bender BS. Respirator tolerance in health care workers. JAMA 2009;301(1):36-8.
- 7. Song B. Evolving COVID-19 Sampling... ‘Super-speed Walking Through Test’ Came Out [Internet]. Joongang Ilbo; 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 31]. Available from: https://news.joins.com/article/23743568
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- PID air pressure controller in a positive pressure screening cabinet (PPS-Cabinet) for healthcare operator screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Sommas Kaewluan, Nathawat Unsomsri, Songkran Wiriyasart
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management.2025; 40: 100497. CrossRef - Repurposing phone booths into COVID-19 sampling stations: medical operator experiences
Martin Schoch, Sunaree Lawanyawatna
International Journal for Equity in Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Effective Response to a Regional Outbreak of COVID-19: Experience of a Tertiary Emergency Center
Sungbae Moon, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Jae Wan Cho, Haewon Jung
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Critical Concepts for COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Site Operations
Scott A. Goldberg, David Callaway, Daniel Resnick-Ault, Sujal Mandavia, Rodrigo Martinez, Michelle Bass, Eric Goralnick
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - COVID-19 Drive-Through Point of Screening and Testing (POST) System: A Safe, Efficient, and Adaptable Model for Nasopharyngeal Swab Collection
Lauran K. Evans, Austin Shinagawa, Sarah Sutton, Lisa Calvo
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2022; 16(1): 194. CrossRef - Lessons Learned From an Analysis of the Emergency Medical Services’ COVID-19 Drive-Through Testing Facilities in Israel
Itay Zmora, Evan Avraham Alpert, Uri Shacham, Nisim Mishraki, Eli Jaffe
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2022; 16(5): 2091. CrossRef - Positive Pressure Testing Booths Development and Deployment in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak
Kevin Aroom, Jiawei Ge, Lidia Al-Zogbi, Marcee White, Adrienne Trustman, Adena Greenbaum, Jason Farley, Axel Krieger
Journal of Medical Devices.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Bridging values: Finding a balance between privacy and control. The case of Corona apps in Belgium and the Netherlands
Rosamunde van Brakel, Olya Kudina, Chiara Fonio, Kees Boersma
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.2022; 30(1): 50. CrossRef - Viral Etiological Agent(s) of Respiratory Tract Infections in Symptomatic Individuals during the Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Drive-Thru Mobile Collection Site Study
Aleksandra Kozinska, Karolina Wegrzynska, Magdalena Komiazyk, Jaroslaw Walory, Izabela Wasko, Anna Baraniak
Pathogens.2022; 11(4): 475. CrossRef - A 12-month retrospective study of outcomes of COVID-19 drive-through swabbing hubs’ screening of asymptomatic population in Qatar
Mohamed G. Al-Kuwari, Mariam A. Abdulmalik, Azza M. Mohammed, Shaikha Abushaikha, Mujeeb C. Kandy
Journal of Global Health Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - A systematic review of strategies adopted to scale up COVID-19 testing in low-, middle- and high-income countries
Winters Muttamba, Bernadette Ann-Marie O'Hare, Vibhor Saxena, Mudarshiru Bbuye, Parul Tyagi, Andrew Ramsay, Bruce Kirenga, Wilber Sabiiti
BMJ Open.2022; 12(11): e060838. CrossRef - Effective Management of the Rapid Spread of the COVID-19 Virus in South Korea: Social and Institutional Learning from MERS
Kwangho Jung
Public Administration Quarterly.2022; 46(4): 384. CrossRef - COVID-19 screening center models in South Korea
Ji Eon Kim, Ji Ho Lee, Hocheol Lee, Seok Jun Moon, Eun Woo Nam
Journal of Public Health Policy.2021; 42(1): 15. CrossRef - Identifying patients with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 at elevated risk of adverse events: The COVAS score
Adam L. Sharp, Brian Z. Huang, Benjamin Broder, Matthew Smith, George Yuen, Christopher Subject, Claudia Nau, Beth Creekmur, Sara Tartof, Michael K. Gould
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 46: 489. CrossRef - SARS-CoV-2 Wave Two Surveillance in East Asia and the Pacific: Longitudinal Trend Analysis
Lori Ann Post, Jasmine S Lin, Charles B Moss, Robert Leo Murphy, Michael G Ison, Chad J Achenbach, Danielle Resnick, Lauren Nadya Singh, Janine White, Michael J Boctor, Sarah B Welch, James Francis Oehmke
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(2): e25454. CrossRef - Flattening the Curve on COVID-19: South Korea’s Measures in Tackling Initial Outbreak of Coronavirus
Daejoong Lee, Kyungmoo Heo, Yongseok Seo, Hyerim Ahn, Kyungran Jung, Sohyun Lee, Hyeseung Choi
American Journal of Epidemiology.2021; 190(4): 496. CrossRef - SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing: A method to improve surveillance programmes
Paula Iruzubieta, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Javier Crespo
Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2021; 44(6): 395. CrossRef - Feasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at home
Paula Iruzubieta, Tatiana Fernández-Lanas, Laura Rasines, Lorena Cayon, Ana Álvarez-Cancelo, Alvaro Santos-Laso, Agustín García-Blanco, Soraya Curiel-Olmo, Joaquín Cabezas, Reinhard Wallmann, Emilio Fábrega, Víctor M. Martínez-Taboada, José L. Hernández,
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - How social innovations spread globally through the process of reverse innovation: a case-study from the South Korea
Chiara Cannavale, Lorenza Claudio, Michele Simoni
Italian Journal of Marketing.2021; 2021(4): 421. CrossRef - SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing: A method to improve surveillance programmes
Paula Iruzubieta, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Javier Crespo
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2021; 44(6): 395. CrossRef - Predicted Impact of Vaccination and Active Case Finding Measures to Control Epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in a Migrant-Populated Area in Thailand
Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Natthaprang Nittayasoot, Panithee Thammawijaya, Pard Teekasap, Kumnuan Ungchusak
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy.2021; Volume 14: 3197. CrossRef - A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2
C.R. Foster, F. Campbell, L. Blank, A.J. Cantrell, M. Black, A.C.K. Lee
Public Health.2021; 198: 22. CrossRef - How we should respond to the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: A German perspective
F. Jung, V. Krieger, F.T. Hufert, J.-H. Küpper
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation.2020; 74(4): 363. CrossRef - Can the UK emulate the South Korean approach to covid-19?
Azeem Majeed, Yongseok Seo, Kyungmoo Heo, Daejoong Lee
BMJ.2020; : m2084. CrossRef - Innovative countermeasures can maintain cancer care continuity during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic in Korea
Soohyeon Lee, Ah-reum Lim, Min Ja Kim, Yoon Ji Choi, Ju Won Kim, Kyong Hwa Park, Sang Won Shin, Yeul Hong Kim
European Journal of Cancer.2020; 136: 69. CrossRef - Effect of COVID‐19 on liver transplantation in Korea
Jeong‐Moo Lee
Transplant Infectious Disease.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Drive-Through Screening at an Academic Military Medical Center
David A Lindholm, John L Kiley, Nathan K Jansen, Robert T Hoard, Matthew R Bondaryk, Elizabeth M Stanley, Gadiel R Alvarado, Ana E Markelz, Robert J Cybulski, Jason F Okulicz
Open Forum Infectious Diseases.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Policies and innovations to battle Covid-19 – A case study of South Korea
Doowon Lee, Bobae Choi
Health Policy and Technology.2020; 9(4): 587. CrossRef - Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe
Emeline Han, Melisa Mei Jin Tan, Eva Turk, Devi Sridhar, Gabriel M Leung, Kenji Shibuya, Nima Asgari, Juhwan Oh, Alberto L García-Basteiro, Johanna Hanefeld, Alex R Cook, Li Yang Hsu, Yik Ying Teo, David Heymann, Helen Clark, Martin McKee, Helena Legido-Q
The Lancet.2020; 396(10261): 1525. CrossRef - COVID-19: challenges and opportunities
Adam J Singer, Bettina C Fries
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2020; 7(3): 141. CrossRef - Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Retrospective Spatial Analysis and the Geocoding of Accesses. A Pilot Study in Rome
Cristiano Pesaresi, Giuseppe Migliara, Davide Pavia, Corrado De Vito
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.2020; 9(10): 579. CrossRef - COVID-19 pandemic's effects on the quality of pregnant women's emergency treatment: Review of two cases from a medical center in northern Taiwan
Wen-Han Chang
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(6): 795. CrossRef - A conceptual framework for Emergency department design in a pandemic
Gayathri Devi Nadarajan, Eunizar Omar, Benjamin S. Abella, Pei Shan Hoe, Sang Do Shin, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - COVID-19, flattening the curve: recommendations towards control and managing a second wave
Iziegbe Fenemigho, Ewaenosa Ukponmwan, Elizabeth C Nnakwue, Iboro Udoete, Chisom Asuzu, Adeleye Adaralegbe, Utibe Effiong
Journal of Global Health Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef