| Simulation intervention related to family presence during resuscitation for physicians and medical students: A scoping review |
| Kyung Hye Park1,2,3, Jannet J. Lee-Jayaram1, Melissa K. Kahili-Heede4, Benjamin W. Berg1 |
1SimTiki Simulation Center, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America
2Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Wonju, South Korea
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, South Korea
4John A. Burns School of Medicine, Health Sciences Library, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America |
| Correspondence
Kyung Hye Park Tel: +82.33.741.0242, Fax: +82.33.742.5034, Email: erdoc@yonsei.ac.kr |
|
Received: March 28, 2024. Revised: May 31, 2024. Accepted: June 3, 2024. Published online: July 19, 2024. |
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
Objective
Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is known as part of family-centered care. However, it is unknown or how physicians are educated for FPDR. We aim to review the current status of simulation related FPDR for physicians and medical students.
Methods
A scoping review of literature published from 1999 to May 5 2023 and written in English was undertaken. The articles were searched for using keyword combinations of the following words; family, resuscitation, and simulation-related words.
Results
Eight articles were included in the final review. This review of FPDR simulation for physicians and medical students revealed findings in three categories; measuring CPR quality, investigating participant responses after FPDR simulation, and extracting exemplar good communication elements. First, in four studies measuring resuscitation quality, physicians participated in adult resuscitation, and resuscitation quality was reduced with overt reaction family presence. Second, in three studies investigating the response to simulation training, interprofessional teams participating in pediatric resuscitation had negative responses to FPDR simulation. Third, in one study, good communication elements during FPDR were found in infant simulation, in which interprofessional teams participated. FPDR simulation training for medical students has not been reported.
Conclusion
It highlighted a gap in FPDR simulations involving physicians and/or medical students. Physicians were more concerned with resuscitation quality than supporting families during resuscitation simulations. Medical students should be considered as the main participants for FPDR simulation. More high-evidence studies with interprofessional teams including physicians and/or medical students are needed to evaluate curriculum design and participant response changes following FPDR simulation. |
| Keywords:
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Family support; Patient-centered care; Physicians |
|
|
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI
Download Citation 
